Suppr超能文献

两种不同全瓷系统透明度的体外评估与比较

In Vitro Evaluation and Comparison of the Translucency of Two Different All-Ceramic Systems.

作者信息

Jurišić Sanja, Jurišić Gordan, Zlatarić Dubravka Knezović

机构信息

- Dental polyclinic Jurišić, Kneza Branimira 11, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Department of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gundulićeva 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015 Sep;49(3):195-203. doi: 10.15644/asc49/3/1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the translucency of two different all-ceramic systems using Vita Easyshade digital shade matching device in an in vitro model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Translucency of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press) and zirconia all-ceramic system (Ceramill ZI) were evaluated and compared. A total of 5 square-shaped specimens with 0.5 mm thickness were fabricated from each ceramic system in A1 shade according to Vitapan Classical shade tab. Specimens were then veneered and glazed with corresponding veneer ceramics recommended by each system manufacturer and the total thickness was set to 1.5 mm. Translucency was evaluated using VITA Easyshade in two stages: before and after veneering and glazing on black and white background. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated. A one-way ANOVA and Bonferonni tests were used when appropriate (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic was significantly more translucent than the zirconia system in both stages (P<0.05). Translucency of all specimens was significantly decreased after veneering and glazing in both all-ceramic systems (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The translucency of two different dental ceramics was significantly influenced by both material and stages of preparation. Within the limitations of the experiment, these results can be valuable and help the clinician to make appropriate esthetic decisions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用Vita Easyshade数字比色仪,在体外模型中评估和比较两种不同全瓷系统的透明度。

材料与方法

评估并比较二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max Press)和氧化锆全瓷系统(Ceramill ZI)的透明度。根据维他经典比色板,从每个陶瓷系统制作5个厚度为0.5毫米的方形试件,颜色为A1。然后用每个系统制造商推荐的相应饰面陶瓷对试件进行贴面和上釉处理,总厚度设定为1.5毫米。使用VITA Easyshade在两个阶段评估透明度:在黑色和白色背景上进行贴面和上釉处理之前和之后。计算透明度参数(TP)。在适当情况下使用单向方差分析和Bonferonni检验(α=0.05)。

结果

在两个阶段中,二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的透明度均显著高于氧化锆系统(P<0.05)。在两个全瓷系统中,所有试件在贴面和上釉处理后的透明度均显著降低(P<0.05)。

结论

两种不同牙科陶瓷的透明度受材料和制备阶段的显著影响。在实验的局限性范围内,这些结果可能有价值,并有助于临床医生做出适当的美学决策。

相似文献

2
Comparison of the translucency of shaded zirconia all-ceramic systems.阴影氧化锆全瓷系统的半透明度比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Oct;6(5):415-22. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.415. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
9
Translucency and flexural strength of translucent zirconia ceramics.半透明氧化锆陶瓷的半透明性和抗弯强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Apr;129(4):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the translucency of shaded zirconia all-ceramic systems.阴影氧化锆全瓷系统的半透明度比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Oct;6(5):415-22. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.415. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
2
Do surface treatments affect the optical properties of ceramic veneers?表面处理会影响陶瓷贴面的光学性能吗?
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):618-24. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 17.
5
Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses.不同厚度牙科陶瓷的透光性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jul;110(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60333-9.
10
Translucency of shaded zirconia core material.着色氧化锆内层材料的半透明度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 May;105(5):304-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60056-5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验