Jurišić Sanja, Jurišić Gordan, Zlatarić Dubravka Knezović
- Dental polyclinic Jurišić, Kneza Branimira 11, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Department of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gundulićeva 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015 Sep;49(3):195-203. doi: 10.15644/asc49/3/1.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the translucency of two different all-ceramic systems using Vita Easyshade digital shade matching device in an in vitro model.
Translucency of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press) and zirconia all-ceramic system (Ceramill ZI) were evaluated and compared. A total of 5 square-shaped specimens with 0.5 mm thickness were fabricated from each ceramic system in A1 shade according to Vitapan Classical shade tab. Specimens were then veneered and glazed with corresponding veneer ceramics recommended by each system manufacturer and the total thickness was set to 1.5 mm. Translucency was evaluated using VITA Easyshade in two stages: before and after veneering and glazing on black and white background. Translucency parameter (TP) was calculated. A one-way ANOVA and Bonferonni tests were used when appropriate (α=0.05).
Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic was significantly more translucent than the zirconia system in both stages (P<0.05). Translucency of all specimens was significantly decreased after veneering and glazing in both all-ceramic systems (P<0.05).
The translucency of two different dental ceramics was significantly influenced by both material and stages of preparation. Within the limitations of the experiment, these results can be valuable and help the clinician to make appropriate esthetic decisions.
本研究旨在使用Vita Easyshade数字比色仪,在体外模型中评估和比较两种不同全瓷系统的透明度。
评估并比较二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max Press)和氧化锆全瓷系统(Ceramill ZI)的透明度。根据维他经典比色板,从每个陶瓷系统制作5个厚度为0.5毫米的方形试件,颜色为A1。然后用每个系统制造商推荐的相应饰面陶瓷对试件进行贴面和上釉处理,总厚度设定为1.5毫米。使用VITA Easyshade在两个阶段评估透明度:在黑色和白色背景上进行贴面和上釉处理之前和之后。计算透明度参数(TP)。在适当情况下使用单向方差分析和Bonferonni检验(α=0.05)。
在两个阶段中,二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的透明度均显著高于氧化锆系统(P<0.05)。在两个全瓷系统中,所有试件在贴面和上釉处理后的透明度均显著降低(P<0.05)。
两种不同牙科陶瓷的透明度受材料和制备阶段的显著影响。在实验的局限性范围内,这些结果可能有价值,并有助于临床医生做出适当的美学决策。