Suppr超能文献

半透明氧化锆陶瓷的半透明性和抗弯强度

Translucency and flexural strength of translucent zirconia ceramics.

作者信息

Reale Reyes Andrea, Dennison Joseph B, Powers John M, Sierraalta Marianella, Yaman Peter

机构信息

Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois School of Dentistry, Chicago, Ill.

Professor Emeritus, Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Mich.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Apr;129(4):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Translucent zirconias have been developed with better esthetics than high-strength zirconias by reducing opacity. However, studies on their translucency and strength are sparse.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the relationship between translucency and biaxial flexural strength of recently developed high-translucency zirconia, high-strength zirconia, and lithium disilicate ceramics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Disks (n=12) were fabricated for 5 ceramic materials: high-strength zirconia (BruxZir 16 shaded), translucent zirconia (BruxZir Anterior shaded, Katana UTML, Katana STML), and lithium disilicate (IPS e.max, Press HT, and LT). A standard tessellation language (STL) file was designed, and the specimen milled, finished, and glazed according to manufacturer's instructions for each material. The translucency parameter was calculated against black and white backgrounds and white and stump shade with ND4 background by using a spectrophotometer. Biaxial flexural strength was calculated by using the 3-ball test. The load was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min with a 49-N load cell until failure occurred. Translucency parameter and biaxial flexural strength data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A Tukey honest significant difference multiple comparison test was used to determine significant differences (α=.05).

RESULTS

The IPS e.max HT was more translucent against both backgrounds (32.85 for black/white and 15.34 for white/stump), while BruxZir 16 was the least translucent (19.78 for B/W and 8.83 for W/S). All groups tested differed in translucency (P<.001) except for BruxZir Anterior and Katana STML, which were not significantly different (P=.052). For biaxial flexural strength, BruxZir 16 had the highest strength (995.44 MPa) and e.max HT, the lowest (186.75 MPa). No significant differences were found between BruxZir anterior and Katana STML, Katana UTML and IPS e.max LT, or IPS e.max LT and IPS e.max HT (P>.05). Translucency parameter values using both backgrounds were strongly correlated (r=0.99). However, biaxial flexural strength values were inversely related to translucency parameter values when using black/white and white/stump shade but with high correlation (r=-0.777 and -0.756 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lithium disilicate was the most translucent and yet the weakest material, whereas high-strength zirconia was the most opaque ceramic and the strongest. Katana UTML had the highest translucency but was weakest among translucent and high-strength zirconia materials. Overall, translucency was negatively correlated with biaxial flexural strength.

摘要

问题陈述

通过降低不透明度,已开发出比高强度氧化锆具有更好美学效果的半透明氧化锆。然而,关于其半透明性和强度的研究却很少。

目的

本体外研究的目的是比较最近开发的高透明氧化锆、高强度氧化锆和二硅酸锂陶瓷的半透明性与双轴弯曲强度之间的关系。

材料与方法

为5种陶瓷材料制作圆盘(n = 12):高强度氧化锆(BruxZir 16色号)、半透明氧化锆(BruxZir前牙色号、Katana UTML、Katana STML)和二硅酸锂(IPS e.max、Press HT和LT)。设计了一个标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件,并根据每种材料的制造商说明对试样进行铣削、精加工和上釉。使用分光光度计在黑色和白色背景以及白色和残根色号背景下,以ND4背景计算半透明参数。通过三球试验计算双轴弯曲强度。以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度和49 N的测力传感器施加负载,直至发生破坏。对半透明参数和双轴弯曲强度数据进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。使用Tukey诚实显著差异多重比较检验来确定显著差异(α = 0.05)。

结果

IPS e.max HT在两种背景下都更具半透明性(黑/白背景下为32.85,白/残根背景下为15.34),而BruxZir 16的半透明性最差(黑/白背景下为19.78,白/残根背景下为8.83)。除BruxZir前牙色号和Katana STML外,所有测试组的半透明性均有差异(P < 0.001),BruxZir前牙色号和Katana STML之间无显著差异(P = 0.052)。对于双轴弯曲强度,BruxZir 16的强度最高(995.44 MPa),e.max HT的强度最低(186.75 MPa)。BruxZir前牙色号和Katana STML、Katana UTML和IPS e.max LT或IPS e.max LT和IPS e.max HT之间未发现显著差异(P > )。使用两种背景的半透明参数值高度相关(r = 0.99)。然而,当使用黑/白和白/残根色号时,双轴弯曲强度值与半透明参数值呈负相关,但相关性较高(分别为r = -0.777和-0.756)。

结论

二硅酸锂是最具半透明性但也是最弱的材料,而高强度氧化锆是最不透明但也是最强的陶瓷。Katana UTML具有最高的半透明性,但在半透明和高强度氧化锆材料中是最弱的。总体而言,半透明性与双轴弯曲强度呈负相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验