Lee Woo Yeon, Kim Min Jung, Lew Dae Hyun, Song Seung Yong, Lee Dong Won
Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Arch Plast Surg. 2016 Sep;43(5):430-7. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.430. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Accurate breast volume assessment is a prerequisite to preoperative planning, as well as intraoperative decision making in breast reconstruction surgery. The use of three-dimensional surface imaging (3D scanning) to assess breast volume has many advantages. However, before employing 3D scanning in the field, the tool's validity should be demonstrated. The purpose of this study was to confirm the validity of 3D-scanning technology for evaluating breast volume.
We reviewed the charts of 25 patients who underwent breast reconstruction surgery immediately after total mastectomy. Breast volumes using the Axis Three 3D scanner, water-displacement technique, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained bilaterally in the preoperative period. During the operation, the tissue removed during total mastectomy was weighed and the specimen volume was calculated from the weight. Then, we compared the volume obtained from 3D scanning with those obtained using the water-displacement technique, MRI, and the calculated volume of the tissue removed.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of breast volumes obtained from 3D scanning, as compared to the volumes obtained using the water-displacement technique and specimen weight, demonstrated excellent reliability. The ICC of breast volumes obtained using 3D scanning, as compared to those obtained by MRI, demonstrated substantial reliability. Passing-Bablok regression showed agreement between 3D scanning and the water-displacement technique, and showed a linear association of 3D scanning with MRI and specimen volume, respectively.
When compared with the classical water-displacement technique and MRI-based volumetry, 3D scanning showed significant reliability and a linear association with the other two methods.
准确的乳房体积评估是乳房重建手术术前规划以及术中决策的前提条件。使用三维表面成像(3D扫描)来评估乳房体积具有诸多优势。然而,在该领域应用3D扫描之前,应证明该工具的有效性。本研究的目的是证实3D扫描技术评估乳房体积的有效性。
我们回顾了25例全乳切除术后立即接受乳房重建手术患者的病历。术前使用Axis Three 3D扫描仪、水置换技术和磁共振成像(MRI)双侧测量乳房体积。手术过程中,对全乳切除术中切除的组织进行称重,并根据重量计算标本体积。然后,我们将3D扫描获得的体积与水置换技术、MRI获得的体积以及计算出的切除组织体积进行比较。
与水置换技术和标本重量获得的乳房体积相比,3D扫描获得的乳房体积的组内相关系数(ICC)显示出极佳的可靠性。与MRI获得的乳房体积相比,3D扫描获得的乳房体积的ICC显示出较高的可靠性。Passing-Bablok回归显示3D扫描与水置换技术之间具有一致性,并且分别显示出3D扫描与MRI和标本体积之间的线性关联。
与传统的水置换技术和基于MRI的体积测量法相比,3D扫描显示出显著的可靠性以及与其他两种方法的线性关联。