Suppr超能文献

付诸实践:癌症患者对“不要复苏”决策的看法

Translating into Practice Cancer Patients' Views on Do-Not-Resuscitate Decision-Making.

作者信息

Olver Ian N, Eliott Jaklin A

机构信息

Sansom Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia.

School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, Australia.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2016 Sep 27;8(10):89. doi: 10.3390/cancers8100089.

Abstract

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are necessary if resuscitation, the default option in hospitals, should be avoided because a patient is known to be dying and attempted resuscitation would be inappropriate. To avoid inappropriate resuscitation at night, if no DNR order has been recorded, after-hours medical staff are often asked to have a DNR discussion with patients whose condition is deteriorating, but with whom they are unfamiliar. Participants in two qualitative studies of cancer patients' views on how to present DNR discussions recognized that such patients are at different stages of understanding of their situation and may not be ready for a DNR discussion; therefore, a one-policy-fits-all approach was thought to be inappropriate. To formulate a policy that incorporates the patient's views, we propose that a standard form which mandates a DNR discussion is replaced by a "blank sheet" with instructions to record the progress of the discussion with the patient, and a medical recommendation for a DNR decision to guide the nursing staff in case of a cardiac arrest. Such an advance care directive would have to honor specifically expressed patient or guardian wishes whilst allowing for flexibility, yet would direct nurses or other staff so that they can avoid inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a patient dying of cancer.

摘要

如果已知患者濒临死亡且进行复苏尝试不合适,那么放弃复苏医嘱(DNR)是必要的,因为在医院中默认的选项是进行复苏。为了避免在夜间进行不适当的复苏,如果没有记录DNR医嘱,通常会要求下班后的医护人员与病情正在恶化但他们并不熟悉的患者进行DNR讨论。两项关于癌症患者对如何进行DNR讨论的观点的定性研究的参与者认识到,此类患者对自身状况的理解处于不同阶段,可能还未准备好进行DNR讨论;因此,一刀切的方法被认为是不合适的。为了制定一项纳入患者观点的政策,我们建议将要求进行DNR讨论的标准表格替换为一张“空白表格”,该表格带有记录与患者讨论进展情况的说明,以及一份关于DNR决定的医疗建议,以便在心脏骤停时指导护理人员。这样一份预先护理指令必须尊重患者或监护人明确表达的意愿,同时允许灵活性,并且能指导护士或其他工作人员,使他们能够避免对正在死于癌症的患者进行不适当的心肺复苏。

相似文献

3
Do-not-resuscitate order after 25 years.25年后的“不要复苏”医嘱。
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1543-50. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000064743.44696.49.
8
Potential impact of a verbal prehospital DNR policy.口头院前 DNR 政策的潜在影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):169-72. doi: 10.1080/10903120802471923.

本文引用的文献

2
["Do-not-rescuscitate"--Results of introducing a standardized order sheet on documentation quality].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Jul;140(15):e159-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-103164. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
8
Advanced care directives: an update.
Aust Nurs J. 2013 Jun;20(11):22.
10
Legal perspectives on consent in disputes about futile care.
Med J Aust. 2013 Mar 4;198(4):225-6. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10789.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验