Stroberg Wylie, Schnell Santiago
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Brehm Center for Diabetes Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
Math Biosci. 2017 May;287:3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
The simple bimolecular ligand-receptor binding interaction is often linearized by assuming pseudo-first-order kinetics when one species is present in excess. Here, a phase-plane analysis allows the derivation of a new condition for the validity of pseudo-first-order kinetics that is independent of the initial receptor concentration. The validity of the derived condition is analyzed from two viewpoints. In the first, time courses of the exact and approximate solutions to the ligand-receptor rate equations are compared when all rate constants are known. The second viewpoint assesses the validity through the error induced when the approximate equation is used to estimate kinetic constants from data. Although these two interpretations of validity are often assumed to coincide, we show that they are distinct, and that large errors are possible in estimated kinetic constants, even when the linearized and exact rate equations provide nearly identical solutions.
当一种物质过量时,简单的双分子配体 - 受体结合相互作用通常通过假定伪一级动力学来线性化。在此,相平面分析允许推导一个与初始受体浓度无关的伪一级动力学有效性的新条件。从两个角度分析了推导条件的有效性。第一个角度是,当所有速率常数已知时,比较配体 - 受体速率方程的精确解和近似解的时间进程。第二个角度是通过使用近似方程从数据估计动力学常数时所引起的误差来评估有效性。尽管通常认为这两种有效性解释是一致的,但我们表明它们是不同的,并且即使线性化和精确的速率方程提供几乎相同的解,估计的动力学常数中也可能存在大的误差。