Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
J Dent. 2016 Dec;55:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Dentists enrolled in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network completed a study questionnaire about techniques and materials used for single-unit crowns and an enrollment questionnaire about dentist/practice characteristics. The objectives were to quantify dentists' material recommendations and test the hypothesis that dentist's and practice's characteristics are significantly associated with these recommendations.
Surveyed dentists responded to a contextual scenario asking what material they would use for a single-unit crown on an anterior and posterior tooth. Material choices included: full metal, porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), all-zirconia, layered zirconia, lithium disilicate, leucite-reinforced ceramic, or other.
1777 of 2132 eligible dentists responded (83%). The top 3 choices for anterior crowns were lithium disilicate (54%), layered zirconia (17%), and leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (13%). There were significant differences (p<0.05) by dentist's gender, race, years since graduation, practice type, region, practice busyness, hours worked/week, and location type. The top 3 choices for posterior crowns were all-zirconia (32%), PFM (31%), and lithium disilicate (21%). There were significant differences (p<0.05) by dentist's gender, practice type, region, practice busyness, insurance coverage, hours worked/week, and location type.
Network dentists use a broad range of materials for single-unit crowns for anterior and posterior teeth, adopting newer materials into their practices as they become available. Material choices are significantly associated with dentist's and practice's characteristics.
Decisions for crown material may be influenced by factors unrelated to tooth and patient variables. Dentists should be cognizant of this when developing an evidence-based approach to selecting crown material.
参加国家牙科实践为基础的研究网络的牙医完成了一项关于单冠使用技术和材料的研究问卷和一份关于牙医/实践特征的入组问卷。目的是量化牙医的材料推荐,并检验牙医和实践特征与这些推荐显著相关的假设。
接受调查的牙医对一个情境问题做出了回答,询问他们在前牙和后牙上单冠会使用什么材料。材料选择包括:全金属、烤瓷熔附金属(PFM)、全氧化锆、分层氧化锆、锂硅玻璃陶瓷、锂辉石增强陶瓷或其他。
在 2132 名符合条件的牙医中,有 1777 名(83%)做出了回应。在前牙冠的首选材料中,锂硅玻璃陶瓷(54%)、分层氧化锆(17%)和锂辉石增强玻璃陶瓷(13%)位居前三。牙医的性别、种族、毕业年限、实践类型、地区、实践繁忙程度、每周工作小时数和地点类型存在显著差异(p<0.05)。在后牙冠的首选材料中,全氧化锆(32%)、PFM(31%)和锂硅玻璃陶瓷(21%)位居前三。牙医的性别、实践类型、地区、实践繁忙程度、保险覆盖范围、每周工作小时数和地点类型存在显著差异(p<0.05)。
网络牙医在前牙和后牙的单冠中使用了广泛的材料,随着新材料的出现,将其应用于实践。材料选择与牙医和实践的特征显著相关。
牙冠材料的选择可能受到与牙齿和患者变量无关的因素的影响。牙医在制定基于证据的牙冠材料选择方法时应注意这一点。