Suppr超能文献

含硅烷通用粘结剂与二硅酸锂的粘结强度

Bond Strength of Silane-Containing Universal Bonding Agents to Lithium Disilicate.

作者信息

Tannen Daniel L, Wallum Adam J, Mitchell Terrell M, Renda James J, Vandewalle Kraig S

机构信息

DDS, MS. Capt, USAF, DC. General Dentist. Dental Clinic. 208 W. D.L. Ingram Avenue, Cannon AFB, NM 88103.

DMD, MS. Maj, USAF, DC. Director, Restorative Dentistry. Advanced Education in General Dentistry Residency. AF Postgraduate Dental School. 1615 Truemper St. Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, TX, USA 78236. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 Apr 1;17(4):e358-e365. doi: 10.4317/jced.62011. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength to lithium disilicate of four silane-containing universal adhesives (SUAs): Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M), Scotchbond Universal Adhesive Plus (3M), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray), and Universal Bond II (Tokuyama), with or without the use of a separate silane primer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Lithium disilicate blocks (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were sectioned to create 4 equal partitions. Blocks were then crystallized and mounted in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes. The blocks were steam cleaned, subjected to 5% hydrofluoric acid etch, rinsed, and prepared with or without silane application. Resin cement was applied to prepared blocks within standardized silicone tubing matrices and light-cured forming four resin cement specimens per block and twelve specimens per group (n=12). The dual-cure resin cement with and without the use of silane served as a positive and negative control, respectively. The tubing was removed and then the specimens were subjected to 500 thermocycles. The specimens were loaded perpendicularly in a universal testing machine with a shear force until bonding failure. The mean microshear bond strength was calculated per group and analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (alpha=0.05). Following testing, each specimen was examined to determine failure mode.

RESULTS

Except for Universal Bond II, an application of silane resulted in a significant increase in bond strength (<0.05) when using the SUAs. Without the use of a silane, Universal Bond II had significantly greater bond strength (<0.0001) than all other SUAs. All the SUAs without the use of silane resulted in lower bond strength (except UB) compared to the typical clinical practice of the use of silane alone. Greater mixed and cohesive failures were observed with groups that used silane.

CONCLUSIONS

Silane-containing universal bonding agents are being marketed in lieu of silane application on the intaglio surface of lithium disilicate prior to cementation. The results from this study indicate that using SUAs (except Universal Bond II) in this manner may decrease bond strength of the interface between lithium disilicate and resin cement. Universal bonding agent, silane, lithium disilicate, bond strength.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估四种含硅烷的通用粘结剂(SUA):3M 全效粘结剂、3M 全效粘结剂加强型、可乐丽 Clearfil 通用快速粘结剂和德山 Universal Bond II 对二硅酸锂的微剪切粘结强度,使用或不使用单独的硅烷偶联剂底漆。

材料与方法

将二硅酸锂块(Ivoclar IPS e.max CAD)切割成 4 个相等的部分。然后对块体进行结晶处理并安装在聚氯乙烯(PVC)管中。对块体进行蒸汽清洁,用 5%氢氟酸蚀刻,冲洗,并在使用或不使用硅烷的情况下进行处理。将树脂水门汀应用于标准化硅胶管模具内处理好的块体上,并进行光固化,每个块体形成 4 个树脂水门汀试件,每组 12 个试件(n = 12)。使用和不使用硅烷的双固化树脂水门汀分别作为阳性和阴性对照。移除管子,然后对试件进行 500 次热循环。在万能试验机上垂直加载试件,施加剪切力直至粘结失效。计算每组的平均微剪切粘结强度,并采用方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。测试后,检查每个试件以确定失效模式。

结果

除 Universal Bond II 外,使用 SUA 时,硅烷的应用导致粘结强度显著增加(P<0.05)。在不使用硅烷的情况下,Universal Bond II 的粘结强度显著高于所有其他 SUA(P<0.0001)。与单独使用硅烷的典型临床实践相比,所有不使用硅烷的 SUA 导致的粘结强度较低(除 UB 外)。在使用硅烷的组中观察到更多的混合和内聚破坏。

结论

含硅烷的通用粘结剂正在作为在粘结前在二硅酸锂凹面应用硅烷的替代产品进行销售。本研究结果表明,以这种方式使用 SUA(除 Universal Bond II 外)可能会降低二硅酸锂与树脂水门汀之间界面的粘结强度。通用粘结剂、硅烷、二硅酸锂、粘结强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2622/12077839/9121666a47f4/jced-17-e358-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验