• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家髋关节骨折数据库中的数据错误:一项局部验证研究。

Data errors in the National Hip Fracture Database: a local validation study.

机构信息

Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1406-1409. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37089.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37089
PMID:27694597
Abstract

AIMS

We present an audit comparing our level I major trauma centre's data for a cohort of patients with hip fractures in the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) with locally held data on these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2036 records for episodes between July 2009 and June 2014 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The demographics of nine patients were recorded incorrectly. The rate of incorrect data in operation codes was most significant with overall accuracy of 0.637 (95% CI 0.615 to 0.658). The sensitivity of NHFD coding ranged from 0.250 to 1.000 and the specificity 0.879 to 0.999. The recording of cementation had a sensitivity of 0.932 and specificity of 0.713. The recording of total hip arthroplasty had a sensitivity of 0.739 and specificity of 0.983. The overall accuracy of mortality data was 0.942 (95% CI 0.931 to 0.952), with sensitivity of 0.967 and specificity of 0.419.

CONCLUSION

This paper highlights the need for local audit of the integrity of data uploaded to the NHFD. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1406-9.

摘要

目的

我们展示了一项审计,比较了我们一级创伤中心在国家髋关节骨折数据库(NHFD)中髋关节骨折患者队列的数据,以及我们本地数据库中这些患者的数据。

患者和方法

共审查了 2036 例 2009 年 7 月至 2014 年 6 月期间的病历。

结果

9 名患者的 9 名患者的人口统计学数据记录错误。手术代码中的错误数据率最高,总体准确率为 0.637(95%可信区间 0.615 至 0.658)。NHFD 编码的灵敏度范围为 0.250 至 1.000,特异性为 0.879 至 0.999。骨水泥固定的记录灵敏度为 0.932,特异性为 0.713。全髋关节置换术的记录灵敏度为 0.739,特异性为 0.983。死亡率数据的总体准确率为 0.942(95%可信区间 0.931 至 0.952),灵敏度为 0.967,特异性为 0.419。

结论

本文强调了需要对上传到 NHFD 的数据的完整性进行本地审核。

文献出处

Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1406-9.

相似文献

1
Data errors in the National Hip Fracture Database: a local validation study.国家髋关节骨折数据库中的数据错误:一项局部验证研究。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1406-1409. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.37089.
2
The use of an electronic health record system reduces errors in the National Hip Fracture Database.电子健康记录系统的使用减少了国家髋关节骨折数据库中的错误。
Age Ageing. 2019 Mar 1;48(2):285-290. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy177.
3
Implementing the National Hip Fracture Database: An audit of care.实施国家髋部骨折数据库:护理审核
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) - Using a national clinical audit to raise standards of nursing care.国家髋部骨折数据库(NHFD)——利用全国临床审计提高护理标准。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2017 Aug;26:3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
The National Hip Fracture Database is only as good as the data we feed it - significant inaccuracy demonstrated and how to improve it.国家髋关节骨折数据库的质量取决于我们输入的数据——显著的不准确性得到了证明,以及如何改进它。
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):894-897. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.079. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Validation of a prospective cohort study of older adults with hip fractures.老年人髋部骨折前瞻性队列研究的验证。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6):708-714. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1623.R1.
7
The influence of hospital-level variables on hip fracture outcomes.医院层面变量对髋部骨折治疗结果的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Oct;103-B(10):1627-1632. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B10.BJJ-2021-0461.R1.
8
Hip fractures in the winter - Using the National Hip Fracture Database to examine seasonal variation in incidence and mortality.冬季髋部骨折 - 使用国家髋部骨折数据库研究发病率和死亡率的季节性变化。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):1011-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.088. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery Compared With Elective Total Hip Replacement.髋部骨折手术后与选择性全髋关节置换术的结果比较。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1159-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10842.
10
Patient characteristics and risk of subsequent contralateral hip fracture after surgical management of first fracture.首次骨折手术治疗后的患者特征及对侧髋关节后续骨折风险
Injury. 2014 Oct;45(10):1620-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.05.030. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Local Validation of a National Orthopaedic Registry.国家骨科登记处的本地验证
Cureus. 2024 Mar 6;16(3):e55636. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55636. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
A deep learning approach using an ensemble model to autocreate an image-based hip fracture registry.一种使用集成模型自动创建基于图像的髋部骨折登记系统的深度学习方法。
OTA Int. 2023 Dec 22;6(5 Suppl):e283. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000283. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Variation of implant use in A1 and A2 trochanteric hip fractures : a study from the National Hip Fracture Database of England and Wales.
A1型和A2型股骨转子间髋部骨折中植入物使用情况的变化:来自英格兰和威尔士国家髋部骨折数据库的一项研究
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Oct;3(10):741-745. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0104.R1.
4
The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study : epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK.全国开放性骨折患者评估(OPEN)研究:英国开放性骨折治疗的流行病学
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Oct;3(10):746-752. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1.
5
Differences in hip fracture care in Europe: a systematic review of recent annual reports of hip fracture registries.欧洲髋部骨折护理的差异:对髋部骨折登记处近期年度报告的系统评价。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):1625-1638. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01797-8. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
The 30-day survival and recovery after hip fracture by timing of mobilization and dementia : a UK database study.髋部骨折后 30 天的生存和康复与活动时间及痴呆的关系:一项英国数据库研究。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7):1317-1324. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2349.R1.
7
Accuracy of identifying hospital acquired venous thromboembolism by administrative coding: implications for big data and machine learning research.通过行政编码识别医院获得性静脉血栓栓塞的准确性:对大数据和机器学习研究的影响。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):397-405. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00664-6. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦多学科髋部骨折登记处及丹麦国家患者登记处中髋部骨折诊断和外科手术编码的阳性预测值
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 4;12:123-131. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S238722. eCollection 2020.
9
SEARCHeD: Supporting Evaluation, Analysis and Reporting of routinely Collected Healthcare Data.SEARCHeD:支持对常规收集的医疗保健数据进行评估、分析和报告。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):145-147. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-1699.
10
Data verification of nationwide clinical quality registries.全国临床质量登记处的数据验证。
BJS Open. 2019 Aug 19;3(6):857-864. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50209. eCollection 2019 Dec.