Barrio Pablo, Gual Antoni
Neurosciences Institute, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Sep 15;10:1823-1845. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S109641. eCollection 2016.
Patient-centered care (PCC) is increasingly accepted as an integral component of good health care, including addiction medicine. However, its implementation has been controversial in people with alcohol use disorders.
A systematic search strategy was devised to find completed randomized controlled trials enrolling adults (>18 years) with alcohol use disorders. Studies had to use a PCC approach such that they should have been individualized, respectful to the patients' own goals, and empowering. Studies until September 2015 were searched using PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, PsychINFO, and Web of Knowledge.
In total, 40 studies enrolling 16,020 patients met the inclusion criteria. Assessment revealed two main categories of study: psychosocial (n=35 based on motivational interviewing) and pharmacological (n=5 based on an as needed dosing regimen). Psychosocial interventions were further classified according to the presence or absence of an active comparator. When no active comparator was present, studies were classified according to the number of sessions (≥1). Results from single sessions of motivational interviewing showed no clear benefit on alcohol consumption outcomes, with few studies indicating benefit of PCC versus control. Although the results for studies of multiple sessions of counseling were also mixed, many did show a significant benefit of the PCC intervention. By contrast, studies consistently demonstrated a benefit of pharmacologically supported PCC interventions, with most of the differences reaching statistical significance.
PCC-based interventions may be beneficial for reducing alcohol consumption in people with alcohol use disorders.
以患者为中心的护理(PCC)越来越被视为优质医疗保健(包括成瘾医学)不可或缺的组成部分。然而,其在酒精使用障碍患者中的实施一直存在争议。
设计了一种系统的检索策略,以查找纳入成年(>18岁)酒精使用障碍患者的已完成随机对照试验。研究必须采用PCC方法,即应是个性化的,尊重患者自身目标并赋予其自主权。使用PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、PsychINFO和Web of Knowledge检索截至2015年9月的研究。
共有40项纳入16,020名患者的研究符合纳入标准。评估显示主要有两类研究:心理社会干预(基于动机访谈的有n = 35项)和药物治疗(基于按需给药方案的有n = 5项)。心理社会干预根据是否有积极对照进一步分类。当没有积极对照时,研究根据疗程数量(≥1)进行分类。单次动机访谈的结果显示对饮酒结果没有明显益处,很少有研究表明PCC比对照组有优势。虽然多次咨询研究的结果也参差不齐,但许多研究确实显示了PCC干预的显著益处。相比之下,研究一致证明了药物支持的PCC干预的益处,大多数差异具有统计学意义。
基于PCC的干预措施可能有助于减少酒精使用障碍患者的饮酒量。