• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖时胃窦切除切缘的中期临床结局

Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Antrum Resection Margin at Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.

作者信息

Yormaz Serdar, Yılmaz Huseyin, Ece Ilhan, Yılmaz Farise, Sahin Mustafa

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, 42075, Konya, Turkey.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, 42075, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):910-916. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2384-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-016-2384-9
PMID:27696100
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in obesity surgery. The benefits of minimally invasive surgery include rapid recovery. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of different resection margin lengths from the pylorus in LSG.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 152 patients who underwent LSG from January 2011 to October 2014. The antrum was resected 2 cm from the pylorus in 84 patients (group A) and 6 cm from the pylorus in 68 patients (group B). The patients' demographics, staple line distance, complications, sex, age, body mass index loss, length of hospital stay, and comorbidities were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The patients comprised 104 women (68.4 %) and 48 men (32.6 %) with a mean age of 41.2 years (range, 28-53 years). The percent total and excess weight loss were statistically significant in both groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Weight loss was significantly greater in group A than that in B at 6 and 12 months, but the difference at 24 months was not statistically significant. The results of pH monitoring showed significantly lower scores in group A than those in B at 6 and 12 months, but no difference at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

LSG is an effective procedure with good short-term outcomes. Both procedures described herein are equally effective with respect to the patient's return to daily activities. Increasing the distance from the resection line to the pylorus is associated with better weight loss but slightly increased symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease without a significant difference in complications.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)是肥胖症手术中最常施行的手术之一。微创手术的益处包括恢复迅速。我们评估了LSG中距幽门不同切除边缘长度的临床结局。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年1月至2014年10月期间接受LSG的152例患者。84例患者(A组)距幽门2 cm切除胃窦,68例患者(B组)距幽门6 cm切除胃窦。对患者的人口统计学资料、吻合线距离、并发症、性别、年龄、体重指数下降、住院时间和合并症进行回顾性分析。

结果

患者包括104名女性(68.4%)和48名男性(32.6%),平均年龄41.2岁(范围28 - 53岁)。两组术后6个月和12个月时的总体重减轻百分比和超重减轻百分比均具有统计学意义。A组在术后6个月和12个月时的体重减轻明显大于B组,但在24个月时差异无统计学意义。pH监测结果显示,A组在术后6个月和12个月时的得分明显低于B组,但在24个月时无差异。

结论

LSG是一种有效的手术,具有良好的短期结局。本文所述的两种手术在患者恢复日常活动方面同样有效。增加切除线到幽门的距离与更好的体重减轻相关,但胃食管反流病症状略有增加,并发症无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Antrum Resection Margin at Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖时胃窦切除切缘的中期临床结局
Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):910-916. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2384-9.
2
The effect of residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial.残余胃窦大小对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术结局的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.12.025. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
3
Influence of antrum size on gastric emptying and weight-loss outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (preliminary analysis of a randomized trial).胃窦大小对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(一项随机试验的初步分析)后胃排空和减重效果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2739-2745. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5972-4. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study).胃窦切除范围对病态肥胖患者袖状胃切除术手术结局的影响(一项前瞻性随机研究)
Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1587-94. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1242-x.
5
Effect of Resection Distance from Pylorus on Weight Loss Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.胃袖状切除术时距离幽门的切除距离对减重效果的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):2731-2738. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03923-3.
6
Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: Systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗重度肥胖时行胃窦切除术与胃窦保留术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Jun;14(6):857-864. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Older than 60.60岁以上患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的疗效
Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1712-9.
8
The Magnitude of Antral Resection in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and its Relationship to Excess Weight Loss.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦切除的幅度及其与超重减轻的关系。
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1928-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1642-6.
9
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: review of 500 cases in single surgeon Australian practice.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:澳大利亚一名外科医生500例手术回顾
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):673-7. doi: 10.1111/ans.12483. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
10
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Endoscopic Findings and Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms at 18-Month Follow-Up.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:18个月随访时的内镜检查结果及胃食管反流症状
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):71-77. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0398. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleeve gastrectomy with antral resection provides more effective weight loss in patients with super obesity.伴有胃窦切除术的袖状胃切除术能让超级肥胖患者更有效地减重。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 11;410(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03607-w.
2
Antral Preserving Versus Antral Resecting Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients with Severe Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.保留胃窦与切除胃窦的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗重度肥胖患者:一项随机对照试验
Obes Surg. 2025 Feb;35(2):426-433. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07644-0. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
Based on Propensity Matching Scores: Comparison of the Mid-term Outcomes of Two Bariatric Surgeries for the Treatment of Obesity and its Complications.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Sleeve Gastrectomy Always an Absolute Contraindication in Patients with Barrett's?袖状胃切除术对巴雷特食管患者来说始终是绝对禁忌吗?
Obes Surg. 2016 Apr;26(4):715-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1983-1.
2
Reflux characteristics of 113 GERD patients with abnormal 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH tests.113例24小时多通道腔内阻抗-pH测试异常的胃食管反流病患者的反流特征
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Sep;16(9):805-10. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1500027.
3
Gastroesophageal reflux in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: hiatal findings and their management influence outcome.
基于倾向匹配评分:两种减肥手术治疗肥胖症及其并发症的中期结果比较
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07642-2. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
4
Antrum Preservation Versus Antrum Resection in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Effects on Gastric Emptying, Body Mass Index, and Type II Diabetes Remission in Diabetic Patients With Body Mass Index 30-40 kg/m: a Randomized Controlled Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术保胃窦与胃窦切除术对 BMI 30-40kg/m2 的糖尿病患者胃排空、体重指数和 2 型糖尿病缓解的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2022 May;32(5):1412-1420. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05982-5. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
5
Manometric and pH-monitoring changes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后测压和 pH 监测变化的系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2591-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02171-3. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
6
The role of extended antral resection on weight loss and metabolic response after sleeve gastrectomy: A retrospective cohort study.扩大胃窦切除术对袖状胃切除术后体重减轻和代谢反应的作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Sep-Oct;36(6):1228-1233. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.6.2321.
7
Thyroid Hormone Changes After Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without Antral Preservation.袖状胃切除术伴与不伴胃窦保留术后甲状腺激素的变化。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):224-231. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04896-4. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
8
Water Tolerance After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后水耐量
Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1544-1550. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04358-6.
9
Effect of Resection Distance from Pylorus on Weight Loss Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.胃袖状切除术时距离幽门的切除距离对减重效果的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):2731-2738. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03923-3.
10
Food Tolerance After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Total Antral Resection.腹腔镜袖状胃切除加全胃切除术后的食物耐受性。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jul;29(7):2263-2269. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03840-5.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗胃食管反流:裂孔发现及其处理对手术效果的影响
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
4
The effect of residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial.残余胃窦大小对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术结局的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.12.025. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
5
Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a physiopathologic evaluation.胃食管反流病与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:病理生理学评估。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):909-14; discussion 914-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000967.
6
Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study).胃窦切除范围对病态肥胖患者袖状胃切除术手术结局的影响(一项前瞻性随机研究)
Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1587-94. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1242-x.
7
Long-term effects of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus in morbidly obese subjects.袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术对病态肥胖患者 2 型糖尿病的长期影响。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1023-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262ee6b.
8
Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia.胃食管反流病和/或食管裂孔疝肥胖患者行袖状胃切除术和小腿修复术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 May-Jun;9(3):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
9
International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases.国际袖状胃切除术专家小组共识声明:基于超过 12000 例经验的最佳实践指南。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
10
Observations regarding 'quality of life' and 'comfort with food' after bariatric surgery: comparison between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy.关于减重手术后“生活质量”和“对食物的满意度”的观察:腹腔镜可调节胃束带与胃袖状切除术的比较。
Obes Surg. 2011 Aug;21(8):1225-31. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0411-4.