Singh Devender, Monga Sukhda, Ahuja Vineet, Kashyap Lokesh, Kumar Rakesh, Aggarwal Sandeep
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Obes Surg. 2025 Feb;35(2):426-433. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07644-0. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
This study aimed to compare outcomes following antral preserving (AP) and antral resecting (AR) laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of weight loss, gastric emptying time, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), resolution of associated medical problems, and complications.
Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: the AR group (resection starting 2 cm from the pylorus) and the AP group (resection at 5 cm from the pylorus). Follow-up evaluations included assessments of weight loss using percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), gastric emptying, GERD symptoms, associated medical problem resolution, residual gastric volume, and complications. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, gastric scintigraphy, and residual sleeve volumetry were conducted at 12 months.
One hundred patients who met inclusion criteria were enrolled, with comparable baseline parameters such as BMI, age, and comorbidities between the groups. Ninety-five patients underwent randomization (49 in AP group and 46 in the AR group), and outcomes were compared. %EWL was higher in the AR group at 12 and 24 months, although this difference was not statistically significant (AP vs. AR: 64.5 ± 20.6 vs. 72.9 ± 20.8, p = 0.1, and 66.3 ± 21.8 vs. 74 ± 22.2, p = 0.2, respectively). %TWL at 12 months was significantly different between the groups (AP: 28.4 ± 6.4 vs. AR: 32 ± 8, p = 0.01), as was %TWL at 24 months (AP: 29.1 ± 8.4 vs. AR: 33 ± 8.3, p = 0.01). Gastric emptying increased postoperatively in both groups, with significantly higher residual gastric volume in the AP group. Reflux symptoms decreased in both groups compared to baseline, and associated medical problem resolution and major complication rates were similar between the groups.
AR-LSG leads to better weight loss without increasing reflux symptoms compared to AP-LSG. Both procedures showed similar resolution of associated medical problems and complication rates.
CTRI (CTRI/2018/08/015191).
本研究旨在比较保留胃窦(AP)和切除胃窦(AR)的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)在体重减轻、胃排空时间、胃食管反流病(GERD)、相关医学问题的解决以及并发症方面的结果。
患者被前瞻性随机分为两组:AR组(从幽门起2 cm处开始切除)和AP组(从幽门起5 cm处切除)。随访评估包括使用超重减轻百分比(%EWL)和总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)评估体重减轻情况、胃排空、GERD症状、相关医学问题的解决、残余胃容积以及并发症。在12个月时进行上消化道内镜检查、胃闪烁显像和残余袖状胃容积测定。
100名符合纳入标准的患者入组,两组之间的基线参数如BMI、年龄和合并症具有可比性。95名患者进行了随机分组(AP组49名,AR组46名),并比较了结果。AR组在12个月和24个月时的%EWL较高,尽管这种差异无统计学意义(AP组与AR组:分别为64.5±20.6对72.9±20.8,p = 0.1;以及66.3±21.8对74±22.2,p = 0.2)。两组在12个月时的%TWL有显著差异(AP组:28.4±6.4对AR组:32±8,p = 0.01),24个月时的%TWL也是如此(AP组:29.1±8.4对AR组:33±8.3,p = 0.01)。两组术后胃排空均增加,AP组的残余胃容积显著更高。与基线相比,两组的反流症状均减少,两组之间相关医学问题的解决情况和主要并发症发生率相似。
与AP-LSG相比,AR-LSG在不增加反流症状的情况下导致更好的体重减轻。两种手术在相关医学问题的解决情况和并发症发生率方面显示相似。
CTRI(CTRI/2018/08/015191)。