Boeyer M E, Ousley S D
Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65212.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, 1102 Virgina Ave, Columbia, MO 65212.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017 Feb;162(2):229-240. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23110. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
The purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of ossification patterns in the distal femoral, proximal tibial, and proximal fibular epiphyses, and the patella. The results generated from this analysis will be compared with previous standards published by Elgenmark () and Garn et al. () to determine if clinical and skeletal age assessment standards should be updated for contemporary Americans.
Using the Pediatric Radiology Interactive Atlas (Patricia), a total of 1,317 epiphyses were scored for presence or absence from radiographs of 1,056 white individuals born in or after 1990. Statistical modeling of epiphyseal appearance was conducted for all major percentiles, including the 5th and 95th percentiles through logistic regression.
Compared with Elgenmark () and Garn et al. (), our data suggest that the distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses show overall earlier ossification, while the proximal fibular epiphysis shows later ossification. When examining the pooled sex 50th percentile for our data, we found that ossification timing differences are 1.2 weeks earlier in the distal femoral epiphysis, 2.1 weeks earlier in the proximal tibial epiphysis, and 1.4 years later in the proximal fibular epiphysis.
The epiphyses that appear early in life, for example the distal femoral epiphysis, require gestational age information to accurately estimate appearance times. There are considerable differences between the ossification timing patterns presented in this study and those of previous standards, which did not include gestational ages. Several factors may explain the observed differences in the epiphyses of the knee including: the availability of gestational age information, the analysis of longitudinal versus cross-sectional data, differences in socioeconomic status and prenatal care, and secular change. KEYWORDS age estimation, growth standards, ossification, skeletal maturation, subadult/juvenile growth.
本研究旨在分析股骨远端、胫骨近端、腓骨近端骨骺以及髌骨的骨化模式。将该分析所得结果与埃尔根马克()以及加恩等人()之前公布的标准进行比较,以确定当代美国人的临床和骨骼年龄评估标准是否应更新。
使用《儿科放射学互动图谱》(帕特里夏),对1990年及以后出生的1056名白人个体的X线片上共计1317个骨骺进行有无骨化的评分。通过逻辑回归对所有主要百分位数,包括第5和第95百分位数的骨骺出现情况进行统计建模。
与埃尔根马克()和加恩等人()的研究相比,我们的数据表明股骨远端和胫骨近端骨骺总体骨化较早,而腓骨近端骨骺骨化较晚。在查看我们数据的合并性别第50百分位数时,我们发现骨化时间差异为:股骨远端骨骺提前1.2周,胫骨近端骨骺提前2.1周,腓骨近端骨骺推迟1.4年。
在生命早期出现的骨骺,例如股骨远端骨骺,需要胎龄信息来准确估计出现时间。本研究呈现的骨化时间模式与之前未包括胎龄的标准有相当大的差异。几个因素可能解释了在膝关节骨骺中观察到的差异,包括:胎龄信息的可得性、纵向与横断面数据的分析、社会经济地位和产前护理的差异以及长期变化。关键词年龄估计、生长标准、骨化、骨骼成熟、亚成人/青少年生长