Young Sarah, Touyz Stephen, Meyer Caroline, Arcelus Jon, Rhodes Paul, Madden Sloane, Pike Kathleen, Attia Evelyn, Crosby Ross D, Wales Jackie, Hay Phillipa
School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
WMG, University of Warwick, United Kingdom & University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 May;50(5):533-541. doi: 10.1002/eat.22633. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
Compulsive exercise is a prominent feature for the majority of patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), but there is a dearth of research evaluating assessment instruments. This study assessed the concurrent validity of the exercise items of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), with the Compulsive Exercise Test (CET) and other self-report exercise measures in patients with AN. We also aimed to perform validation of the CET in an adult clinical sample.
The sample consisted of 78 adults with AN, recruited for the randomized controlled trial "Taking a LEAP forward in the treatment of anorexia nervosa." At baseline, participants completed the EDE, EDE-Q, CET, Reasons for Exercise Inventory (REI), Commitment to Exercise Scale (CES) and Exercise Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ). Correlational and regression analyses were performed.
EDE exercise days and exercise time per day were positively correlated with each other and with all CET subscales (except Lack of exercise enjoyment), CES mean, EBQ total and REI total. Exercise time per day was associated with a higher EDE global score. The CET demonstrated good concurrent validity with the CES, the REI and the EBQ. Of the self-reports, the CET explained the greatest variance in eating disorder psychopathology and demonstrated good to excellent reliability in this sample.
The EDE and EDE-Q demonstrated good concurrent validity with the CET. Further research is required to evaluate the CET's factor structure in a large clinical sample. However, the CET has demonstrated strong clinical utility in adult patients with AN. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.(Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:533-541).
强迫性运动是大多数神经性厌食症(AN)患者的一个突出特征,但评估工具的研究却很匮乏。本研究评估了进食障碍检查(EDE)和进食障碍检查问卷(EDE-Q)中运动项目与强迫性运动测试(CET)以及AN患者其他自我报告运动测量方法的同时效度。我们还旨在对成人临床样本中的CET进行效度验证。
样本包括78名患有AN的成年人,他们被招募参加“在神经性厌食症治疗中向前迈进一大步”的随机对照试验。在基线时,参与者完成了EDE、EDE-Q、CET、运动原因量表(REI)、运动承诺量表(CES)和运动信念问卷(EBQ)。进行了相关性和回归分析。
EDE运动天数和每日运动时间彼此之间以及与所有CET分量表(除了缺乏运动乐趣)、CES均值、EBQ总分和REI总分均呈正相关。每日运动时间与更高的EDE总体得分相关。CET与CES、REI和EBQ具有良好的同时效度。在自我报告中,CET在进食障碍精神病理学方面解释了最大的方差,并且在该样本中表现出良好到极好的信度。
EDE和EDE-Q与CET具有良好的同时效度。需要进一步研究以评估CET在大型临床样本中的因子结构。然而,CET在成年AN患者中已显示出强大的临床效用。©2016威利期刊公司(《国际进食障碍杂志》2017年;50:533 - 541)