Vrabel Karianne, Bratland-Sanda Solfrid
Research Institute, Modum Bad Psychiatric Center, Vikersund, Norway.
Department of Sports, Physical Education and Outdoor Life, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02370. eCollection 2019.
The objectives of this study were to (1) validate the Norwegian version of the Compulsive Exercise Test (CET) in adults with longstanding eating disorders, and (2) explore predictors of high CET-score.
Adult inpatients ( = 166) with longstanding DSM-IV Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa (BN) or Eating Disorder not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) completed the CET instrument, Eating Disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and Symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90). A total CET score of 15 or above was defined as high CET-score. ANOVA, Confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson's correlation, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.
Cronbach's alpha varied from 0.68 to 0.96 for the CET and its subscales. The confirmatory factor analysis showed adequate fit. Convergent validity of the CET demonstrated correlation between EDE-Q global and subscale scores and CET total score. The same pattern was found for correlation between CET subscales and EDE-Q subscales. EDE-Q global score and frequency of exercise episodes predicted high CET-score, yet 21% of the patients with high CET score had less than one episode of exercise per week.
The Norwegian version of CET is valid and useful for assessing compulsive exercise in a sample with longstanding ED. The understanding of compulsive exercise must to a greater extent differ between obsessions and compulsions, as a significant number of patients with high CET score showed no or little exercise behavior.
本研究的目的是:(1)在患有长期饮食失调的成年人中验证挪威版的强迫性运动测试(CET),以及(2)探索CET高分的预测因素。
患有长期DSM-IV神经性厌食症、神经性贪食症(BN)或未另行规定的饮食失调(EDNOS)的成年住院患者(n = 166)完成了CET量表、饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)、贝克抑郁量表-II(BDI-II)和症状自评量表-90(SCL-90)。CET总分15分及以上被定义为CET高分。采用方差分析、验证性因素分析、皮尔逊相关性分析和逻辑回归分析数据。
CET及其子量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.68至0.96之间。验证性因素分析显示拟合良好。CET的收敛效度表明EDE-Q总体和子量表得分与CET总分之间存在相关性。CET子量表与EDE-Q子量表之间的相关性也呈现相同模式。EDE-Q总体得分和运动发作频率可预测CET高分,但21%的CET高分患者每周运动次数少于一次。
挪威版CET对于评估患有长期饮食失调的样本中的强迫性运动是有效且有用的。由于大量CET高分患者没有或几乎没有运动行为,对强迫性运动的理解在很大程度上必须在强迫观念和强迫行为之间有所不同。