Soulat Gilles, Kachenoura Nadjia, Bollache Emilie, Perdrix Ludivine, Diebold Benoit, Zhygalina Valentina, Latremouille Christian, Laurent Stephane, Fabiani Jean-Noel, Mousseaux Elie
INSERM UMR 970, Paris-Cardiovascular research Center, Paris, France.
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Mar;45(3):795-803. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25399. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
Valvuloarterial impedance (Z ), estimating left ventricle (LV) afterload, has been proposed in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a predictor of mortality in aortic valve stenosis (AVS). However, its calculation differs from arterial characteristic impedance (Z ). Our aim was to apply the concept of Z calculation to estimate Z from MR with carotid tonometry and to evaluate these indices through their associations with symptoms, LV diastolic function and aortic stiffness.
In 40 patients with AVS (76 ± 13 years), Z derived from velocity time integral and E/Ea were estimated by TTE. Z , based on Z formula, calculated as the instantaneous pressure gradient to peak flow ratio and aortic compliance were estimated by using MRI at 1.5 Tesla.
Both Z estimates were higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients (707 ± 22 versus 579 ± 53 dyne.s/cm , P = 0.031 for Z and 4.35 ± 0.16 versus 3.33 ± 0.38 mmHg.m /mL, P = 0.018 for Z ). Although they were both associated with aortic compliance (r = -0.45; P = 0.006 for Z and r = -0.43; P = 0.008 for Z ) only Z was associated with E/Ea (r = 0.50; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis to identify determinants of E/Ea, a model including age, mean blood pressure, LV ejection fraction, LV mass, and aortic valve area was performed (R = 0.41; P < 0.01). When Z was added to the model, its overall significance was higher R = 0.56 (P < 0.01) and Z and LV mass were the only significant determinants.
Z was more strongly associated with diastolic dysfunction than usual parameters quantifying AVS severity. This new Z estimate could improve LV afterload evaluation.
1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:795-803.
在经胸超声心动图(TTE)中,用于评估左心室(LV)后负荷的瓣膜动脉阻抗(Z)已被提出可作为主动脉瓣狭窄(AVS)患者死亡率的预测指标。然而,其计算方法与动脉特性阻抗(Z)不同。我们的目的是应用Z的计算概念,通过颈动脉压力测定法从磁共振成像(MR)中估算Z,并通过它们与症状、左心室舒张功能和主动脉僵硬度的关联来评估这些指标。
对40例AVS患者(76±13岁)进行研究,通过TTE估算从速度时间积分得出的Z以及E/Ea。基于Z公式,通过1.5特斯拉的MRI计算出作为瞬时压力梯度与峰值血流比的Z以及主动脉顺应性。
有症状患者的两种Z估算值均高于无症状患者(Z为707±22与579±53达因·秒/厘米,P = 0.031;Z为4.35±0.16与3.33±0.38毫米汞柱·米/毫升,P = 0.018)。尽管它们均与主动脉顺应性相关(Z的r = -0.45,P = 0.006;Z的r = -0.43,P = 0.008),但只有Z与E/Ea相关(r = 0.50,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析以确定E/Ea的决定因素时,构建了一个包含年龄、平均血压、左心室射血分数、左心室质量和主动脉瓣面积的模型(R = 0.41,P < 0.01)。当将Z添加到模型中时,其总体显著性更高,R = 0.56(P < 0.01),且Z和左心室质量是仅有的显著决定因素。
与量化AVS严重程度的常用参数相比,Z与舒张功能障碍的相关性更强。这种新的Z估算值可能会改善左心室后负荷评估。
1《磁共振成像杂志》2017年;45:795 - 803。