From the Laboratory of Visual Optics and Biophotonics, Instituto de Óptica Daza de Valdés, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
From the Laboratory of Visual Optics and Biophotonics, Instituto de Óptica Daza de Valdés, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1276-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.034.
To evaluate visual and perceptual performance for different orientations of a rotationally asymmetric bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (M-Plus) simulated optically using a simultaneous vision simulator.
Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Spain.
Prospective observational study.
Perceptual quality and decimal high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) was measured under cycloplegia for 8 orientations of the asymmetric bifocal IOL phase pattern at far, intermediate, and near distances simulated with a simultaneous vision simulator using face images and tumbling E targets. The preferred orientation at each distance was calculated as the centroid of the data for 8 orientations. The visual Strehl value was calculated using the subjects' ocular aberrations and multifocal pattern at each orientation. Optical predictions were obtained by implementing a differential visual Strehl values-based ideal observer model.
The study comprised 20 subjects (aged 21 to 62 years). Horizontal orientation (near segment at 0 or 180 degrees ± 45 [SD]) was preferred by 14 subjects and by 13 subjects at far and near distances, respectively; 8 subjects showed strong orientation preferences. The mean difference in preferred orientation between far and near was 27 ± 22 degrees. No significant differences in HCVA were observed. Optical predictions correlated strongly and significantly with measurements (far r = 0.71, near r = 0.62; P < .0001). The mean difference between measurement and simulation in the preferred orientation was 28 ± 29 degrees at far and 36 ± 28 degrees at near.
The perception varied for different orientations of an asymmetric bifocal IOL design tested using a simultaneous vision simulator. Optimum orientation was driven by interactions of the design with the eye's optical aberrations.
None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
使用同时视视觉模拟器评估旋转不对称双焦点人工晶状体(IOL)(M-Plus)不同方位的视觉和知觉性能。
西班牙马德里光学研究所。
前瞻性观察研究。
在睫状肌麻痹下,使用同时视视觉模拟器模拟远、中、近距离,通过人脸图像和翻滚 E 目标对 8 个不对称双焦点 IOL 相位模式的方位进行测量,分别测量知觉质量和十进制高对比度视力(HCVA)。每个距离的最佳方位计算为 8 个方位数据的质心。使用受试者的眼像差和各方位的多焦点模式计算视觉斯特雷尔值。通过实施基于微分视觉斯特雷尔值的理想观察者模型获得光学预测。
本研究包括 20 名受试者(年龄 21 至 62 岁)。14 名受试者和 13 名受试者分别更喜欢水平方位(近节段为 0 度或 180 度±45 [SD]);8 名受试者表现出强烈的方位偏好。远、近最佳方位的平均差异为 27 ± 22 度。HCVA 无显著差异。光学预测与测量结果高度相关且显著相关(远:r = 0.71,近:r = 0.62;P <.0001)。远、近最佳方位的测量值与模拟值之间的平均差异分别为 28 ± 29 度和 36 ± 28 度。
使用同时视视觉模拟器测试的不对称双焦点 IOL 设计的不同方位感知不同。最佳方位由设计与眼睛光学像差的相互作用驱动。
作者均无任何材料或方法的财务或专有利益。