Ekhlaspour Laya, Mondesir Debbie, Lautsch Norman, Balliro Courtney, Hillard Mallory, Magyar Kendra, Radocchia Laura Goergen, Esmaeili Aryan, Sinha Manasi, Russell Steven J
1 Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Research Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):558-566. doi: 10.1177/1932296816672237. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
The accuracy of point-of-care blood glucose (BG) meters is important for the detection of dysglycemia, calculation of insulin doses, and the calibration of continuous glucose monitors. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of commercially available glucose meters in a challenging laboratory study using samples with a wide range of reference BG and hemoglobin values.
Fresh, discarded blood samples from a hospital STAT laboratory were either used without modification, spiked with a glucose solution, or incubated at 37°C to produce 347 samples with an even distribution across reference BG levels from 20 to 440 mg/dl and hemoglobin values from 9 to 16 g/dl. We measured the BG of each sample with 17 different commercially available glucose meters and the reference method (YSI 2300) at the same time. We determined the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for each glucose meter, overall and stratified by reference BG and by hemoglobin level.
The accuracy of different meters widely, exhibiting a range of MARDs from 5.6% to 20.8%. Accuracy was lower in the hypoglycemic range, but was not consistently lower in samples with anemic blood hemoglobin levels.
The accuracy of commercially available glucose meters varies widely. Although the sample mix in this study was much more challenging than those that would be collected under most use conditions, some meters were robust to these challenges and exhibited high accuracy in this setting. These data on relative accuracy and robustness to challenging samples may be useful in informing the choice of a glucose meter.
即时检测血糖仪的准确性对于血糖异常的检测、胰岛素剂量的计算以及连续血糖监测仪的校准至关重要。本研究的目的是在一项具有挑战性的实验室研究中,使用具有广泛参考血糖和血红蛋白值的样本,比较市售血糖仪的准确性。
从医院急诊实验室获取的新鲜废弃血样,要么未经处理直接使用,要么加入葡萄糖溶液,要么在37°C孵育,以产生347个样本,这些样本在20至440mg/dl的参考血糖水平和9至16g/dl的血红蛋白值范围内均匀分布。我们同时使用17种不同的市售血糖仪和参考方法(YSI 2300)测量每个样本的血糖。我们确定了每种血糖仪的平均绝对相对差异(MARD),总体上以及按参考血糖和血红蛋白水平分层。
不同血糖仪的准确性差异很大,MARD范围为5.6%至20.8%。在低血糖范围内准确性较低,但在贫血血红蛋白水平的样本中并不总是较低。
市售血糖仪的准确性差异很大。尽管本研究中的样本组合比大多数使用条件下收集的样本更具挑战性,但一些血糖仪对这些挑战具有较强的适应性,在这种情况下表现出较高的准确性。这些关于相对准确性和对挑战性样本的稳健性的数据可能有助于指导血糖仪的选择。