Humphreys E, Gaydon D S, Eberbach P L
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), CG Block, National Agricultural Science Center (NASC) Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110012, India.
Formerly; IRRI, Philippines; Current address; Griffith, NSW 2680, Australia.
Field Crops Res. 2016 Oct;197:83-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.016.
Machinery for sowing wheat directly into rice residues has become more common in the rice-wheat systems of the north-west Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia, with increasing numbers of farmers now potentially able to access the benefits of residue retention. However, surface residue retention affects soil water and temperature dynamics, thus the optimum sowing date and irrigation management for a mulched crop may vary from those of a traditional non-mulched crop. Furthermore, the effects of sowing date and irrigation management are likely to vary with soil type and seasonal conditions. Therefore, a simulation study was conducted using the APSIM model and 40 years of weather data to evaluate the effects of mulch, sowing date and irrigation management and their interactions on wheat grain yield, irrigation requirement (I) and water productivity with respect to irrigation (WP) and evapotranspiration (WP). The results suggest that the optimum wheat sowing date in central Punjab depends on both soil type and the presence or absence of mulch. On the sandy loam, with irrigation scheduled at 50% soil water deficit (SWD), the optimum sowing date was late October to early November for maximising yield, WP and WP. On the clay loam, the optimum date was about one week later. The effect of mulch on yield varied with seasonal conditions and sowing date. With irrigation at 50% SWD, mulching of wheat sown at the optimum time increased average yield by up to 0.5 t ha. The beneficial effect of mulch on yield increased to averages of 1.2-1.3 t ha as sowing was advanced to 15 October. With irrigation at 50% SWD and 7 November sowing, mulch reduced the number of irrigations by one in almost 50% of years, a reduction of about 50 mm on the sandy loam and 60 mm on the clay loam. The reduction in irrigation amount was mainly due to reduced soil evaporation. Mulch reduced irrigation requirement by more as sowing was delayed, more so on the sandy loam than the clay loam soil. There was little effect of mulch on irrigation requirement for late October sowings. There were large trade-offs between irrigation input, yield, WP and WP on the sandy loam with regard to the optimum irrigation schedule. Maximum yield occurred with very frequent irrigation (10-20% SWD) which also had the greatest irrigation input, while WP was highest with least frequent irrigation (70% SWD), and WP was highest with irrigation at 40-50% SWD. This was the case with and without mulch. On the clay loam, the trade-offs were not so pronounced, as maximum yield was reached with irrigation at 50% SWD, with and without mulch. However, both WP and WP were maximum and irrigation input least at the lowest irrigation frequency (70% SWD). On both soils, maximum yield, WP and WP were higher with mulch, while irrigation input was slightly lower, but mulch had very little effect on the irrigation thresholds at which each parameter was maximised.
在南亚印度河 - 恒河平原西北部的稻麦轮作系统中,将小麦直接播种到水稻残茬上的机械已变得更为常见,现在越来越多的农民有可能受益于残茬保留。然而,地表残茬保留会影响土壤水分和温度动态,因此覆盖作物的最佳播种日期和灌溉管理可能与传统的非覆盖作物不同。此外,播种日期和灌溉管理的影响可能因土壤类型和季节条件而异。因此,利用APSIM模型和40年的气象数据进行了一项模拟研究,以评估覆盖、播种日期和灌溉管理及其相互作用对小麦籽粒产量、灌溉需求(I)以及灌溉水分生产率(WP)和蒸散水分生产率(WP)的影响。结果表明,旁遮普中部的最佳小麦播种日期取决于土壤类型以及是否有覆盖物。在砂壤土上,当灌溉安排在土壤水分亏缺50%(SWD)时,为使产量、WP和WP最大化,最佳播种日期为10月下旬至11月初。在粘壤土上,最佳日期大约晚一周。覆盖对产量的影响随季节条件和播种日期而变化。当灌溉至50% SWD时,在最佳时间播种的小麦覆盖可使平均产量提高多达0.5吨/公顷。随着播种提前至10月15日,覆盖对产量的有益影响增加到平均1.2 - 1.3吨/公顷。当灌溉至50% SWD且11月7日播种时,在近50%的年份里,覆盖使灌溉次数减少一次,在砂壤土上减少约50毫米,在粘壤土上减少60毫米。灌溉量的减少主要是由于土壤蒸发减少。随着播种延迟,覆盖对灌溉需求的减少作用更大,在砂壤土上比在粘壤土上更明显。对于10月下旬播种,覆盖对灌溉需求几乎没有影响。在砂壤土上,关于最佳灌溉时间表,灌溉投入、产量、WP和WP之间存在很大的权衡。非常频繁的灌溉(10 - 20% SWD)时产量最高,但灌溉投入也最大,而灌溉频率最低(70% SWD)时WP最高,灌溉至40 - 50% SWD时WP最高。无论有无覆盖物都是如此。在粘壤土上,权衡并不那么明显,因为无论有无覆盖物,灌溉至50% SWD时都能达到最高产量。然而,在最低灌溉频率(70% SWD)时,WP和WP都最高,灌溉投入最少。在两种土壤上,有覆盖物时最高产量、WP和WP都更高,而灌溉投入略低,但覆盖对每个参数最大化时的灌溉阈值影响很小。