• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社交互动中拥有占主导地位的浪漫伴侣对睾酮反应的影响。

The consequences of having a dominant romantic partner on testosterone responses during a social interaction.

作者信息

Peters Brett J, Hammond Matthew D, Reis Harry T, Jamieson Jeremy P

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, United States.

School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Parade P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.

出版信息

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Dec;74:308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.024
PMID:27701045
Abstract

Testosterone reactivity has been conceptualized as a marker of social submission at low levels and social dominance at high levels. However, hormonal fluctuations in response to romantic partners remain largely unknown. Towards this end, 88 couples (N=176) discussed an emotional video. Prior to the conversation, one member of the dyad (the "agent") was instructed to regulate affective displays in a specific way (express or suppress). The other dyad member (the "partner") was given no special instruction and was unaware of regulation instructions given to the agent. Agents who regulated affective displays were expected to exhibit decreased testosterone from baseline because they were prevented from tuning their emotional responses to their partners. Furthermore, we expected declines in testosterone would be moderated by partners' authoritativeness: People would be particularly submissive to more dominant partners. Predictions were supported for females and partially supported for males. Agents exhibited decreases in testosterone from baseline relative to partners. For females, this main effect was moderated by partners' trait-level authoritativeness: Females interacting with partners higher in authority exhibited larger decreases in testosterone when instructed to restrict their emotion regulation strategies. This research is the first to document testosterone reactivity in existing romantic relationships and underscores the importance of taking into account social and relational contexts when examining hormonal regulation.

摘要

睾酮反应性在低水平时被视为社会顺从的标志,在高水平时则被视为社会主导的标志。然而,对浪漫伴侣做出反应时的激素波动情况仍 largely 未知。为此,88 对情侣(N = 176)讨论了一段情感视频。在对话之前,二元组中的一名成员(“施动者”)被指示以特定方式调节情感表达(表达或抑制)。二元组中的另一名成员(“伴侣”)未得到特殊指示,且不知道给予施动者的调节指示。预计调节情感表达的施动者睾酮水平会较基线下降,因为他们被阻止根据伴侣调整自己的情绪反应。此外,我们预计睾酮水平的下降会受到伴侣权威性的调节:人们会特别顺从更具主导性的伴侣。研究预测对女性得到了支持,对男性则部分得到了支持。与伴侣相比,施动者的睾酮水平相对于基线出现了下降。对于女性而言,这一主效应受到伴侣特质水平权威性的调节:当被指示限制情绪调节策略时,与权威性较高的伴侣互动的女性,其睾酮水平下降幅度更大。这项研究首次记录了现有浪漫关系中的睾酮反应性,并强调在研究激素调节时考虑社会和关系背景的重要性。

相似文献

1
The consequences of having a dominant romantic partner on testosterone responses during a social interaction.在社交互动中拥有占主导地位的浪漫伴侣对睾酮反应的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Dec;74:308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Sharing concerns: Interpersonal worry regulation in romantic couples.分担担忧:浪漫伴侣间的人际担忧调节
Emotion. 2016 Jun;16(4):449-58. doi: 10.1037/a0040112. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
The consequences of suppressing affective displays in romantic relationships: A challenge and threat perspective.压抑浪漫关系中情感表达的后果:挑战与威胁视角。
Emotion. 2016 Oct;16(7):1050-66. doi: 10.1037/emo0000202. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
4
Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Accuracy and Bias in Emotion Regulation Trait Judgments.视而不见,漠不关心?情绪调节特质判断中的准确性和偏差。
J Pers. 2017 Aug;85(4):543-552. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12259. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Responses to dominance challenge are a function of psychopathy level: A multimethod study.对支配挑战的反应是精神变态水平的一个函数:一项多方法研究。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):305-314. doi: 10.1037/per0000252. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
Calibrating Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies to the Relationship Context: An Attachment Perspective.根据依恋视角校准情绪调节策略在关系情境中的运用
J Pers. 2016 Jun;84(3):369-80. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12165. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Hormones in speed-dating: The role of testosterone and cortisol in attraction.速配中的荷尔蒙:睾酮和皮质醇在吸引中的作用。
Horm Behav. 2019 Nov;116:104555. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Suppression sours sacrifice: emotional and relational costs of suppressing emotions in romantic relationships.压抑使牺牲变苦:情感在浪漫关系中被压抑的情绪和关系代价。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jun;38(6):707-20. doi: 10.1177/0146167212437249. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
9
Accuracy and projection in perceptions of partners' recent emotional experiences: Both minds matter.对伴侣近期情感体验认知的准确性与投射:双方的想法都很重要。
Emotion. 2017 Mar;17(2):196-207. doi: 10.1037/emo0000173. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
10
Sex differences in testosterone reactivity during marital conflict.婚姻冲突中睾酮反应的性别差异。
Horm Behav. 2018 Sep;105:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpersonal Conversations Are Characterized by Increases in Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia.人际对话的特征是呼吸性窦性心律不齐增加。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Mar;62(3):e70043. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70043.
2
Hormonal responses to brief social interactions: The role of psychosocial stress and relationship status.激素对短暂社会互动的反应:心理社会压力和关系状况的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287153. eCollection 2023.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of emotion regulation on cortisol.
情绪调节对皮质醇影响的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2020 Dec 11;5:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2020.100020. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Interactions between emotions and eating behaviors: Main issues, neuroimaging contributions, and innovative preventive or corrective strategies.情绪与饮食行为的相互作用:主要问题、神经影像学贡献及创新性预防或矫正策略。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Aug;23(4):807-831. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09700-x. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Capitalizing on Appraisal Processes to Improve Affective Responses to Social Stress.利用评估过程改善对社会压力的情感反应。
Emot Rev. 2018 Jan;10(1):30-39. Epub 2017 Oct 20.