Alem Sylvain, Perry Clint J, Zhu Xingfu, Loukola Olli J, Ingraham Thomas, Søvik Eirik, Chittka Lars
Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun Town, Yunnan, P. R. China.
PLoS Biol. 2016 Oct 4;14(10):e1002564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002564. eCollection 2016 Oct.
Social insects make elaborate use of simple mechanisms to achieve seemingly complex behavior and may thus provide a unique resource to discover the basic cognitive elements required for culture, i.e., group-specific behaviors that spread from "innovators" to others in the group via social learning. We first explored whether bumblebees can learn a nonnatural object manipulation task by using string pulling to access a reward that was presented out of reach. Only a small minority "innovated" and solved the task spontaneously, but most bees were able to learn to pull a string when trained in a stepwise manner. In addition, naïve bees learnt the task by observing a trained demonstrator from a distance. Learning the behavior relied on a combination of simple associative mechanisms and trial-and-error learning and did not require "insight": naïve bees failed a "coiled-string experiment," in which they did not receive instant visual feedback of the target moving closer when tugging on the string. In cultural diffusion experiments, the skill spread rapidly from a single knowledgeable individual to the majority of a colony's foragers. We observed that there were several sequential sets ("generations") of learners, so that previously naïve observers could first acquire the technique by interacting with skilled individuals and, subsequently, themselves become demonstrators for the next "generation" of learners, so that the longevity of the skill in the population could outlast the lives of informed foragers. This suggests that, so long as animals have a basic toolkit of associative and motor learning processes, the key ingredients for the cultural spread of unusual skills are already in place and do not require sophisticated cognition.
群居昆虫巧妙地利用简单机制来实现看似复杂的行为,因此可能为发现文化所需的基本认知要素提供独特资源,即通过社会学习从“创新者”传播到群体中其他个体的群体特定行为。我们首先探究了大黄蜂是否能通过拉绳子来获取够不到的奖励,从而学会一项非自然的物体操控任务。只有少数个体“创新”并自发解决了任务,但大多数蜜蜂在逐步训练后能够学会拉绳子。此外,未接触过该任务的蜜蜂通过远距离观察经过训练的示范者学会了这项任务。学习该行为依赖于简单的联想机制和试错学习的结合,并不需要“顿悟”:未接触过该任务的蜜蜂在“盘绕绳实验”中失败了,在这个实验中,它们在拉绳子时没有得到目标靠近的即时视觉反馈。在文化传播实验中,这项技能从单个有经验的个体迅速传播到蜂群中的大多数觅食者。我们观察到有几个连续的学习者群体(“代”),这样之前未接触过该任务的观察者可以首先通过与熟练个体互动来掌握这项技术,随后自己成为下一批“代”学习者的示范者,从而使这项技能在群体中的延续时间超过有经验的觅食者的寿命。这表明,只要动物具备联想和运动学习过程的基本工具包,不寻常技能文化传播的关键要素就已具备,并不需要复杂的认知。