Cook Paul F, Schmiege Sarah J, Mansberger Steven L, Sheppler Christina, Kammer Jeffrey, Fitzgerald Timothy, Kahook Malik Y
a College of Nursing , University of Colorado , Aurora , CO , USA.
b Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health , Portland , OR , USA.
Psychol Health. 2017 Feb;32(2):145-165. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1244537. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Nonadherence reduces glaucoma treatment efficacy. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a well-studied adherence intervention, but has not been tested in glaucoma. Reminder interventions also may improve adherence.
201 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were urn-randomised to receive MI delivered by an ophthalmic technician (OT), usual care or a minimal behavioural intervention (reminder calls).
Outcomes included electronic monitoring with Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) bottles, two self-report adherence measures, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Multilevel modelling was used to test differences in MEMS results by group over time; ANCOVA was used to compare groups on other measures.
Reminder calls increased adherence compared to usual care based on MEMS, p = .005, and self-report, p = .04. MI had a nonsignificant effect but produced higher satisfaction than reminder calls, p = .007. Treatment fidelity was high on most measures, with observable differences in behaviour between groups. All groups had high baseline adherence that limited opportunities for change.
Reminder calls, but not MI, led to better adherence than usual care. Although a large literature supports MI, reminder calls might be a cost-effective intervention for patients with high baseline adherence. Replication is needed with less adherent participants.
不依从会降低青光眼治疗效果。动机性访谈(MI)是一种经过充分研究的依从性干预措施,但尚未在青光眼患者中进行测试。提醒干预措施也可能提高依从性。
201例青光眼或高眼压症患者通过抽签随机分组,分别接受由眼科技术员实施的动机性访谈、常规护理或最低限度行为干预(提醒电话)。
观察指标包括使用药物事件监测系统(MEMS)药瓶进行电子监测、两项自我报告的依从性测量、患者满意度和临床结局。采用多水平模型来测试不同组随时间推移在MEMS结果上的差异;采用协方差分析来比较不同组在其他指标上的差异。
与常规护理相比,提醒电话基于MEMS提高了依从性(p = 0.005),基于自我报告也提高了依从性(p = 0.04)。动机性访谈效果不显著,但比提醒电话产生了更高的满意度(p = 0.007)。大多数指标的治疗保真度较高,不同组之间在行为上存在明显差异。所有组的基线依从性都很高,这限制了改变的机会。
与常规护理相比,提醒电话而非动机性访谈导致了更好的依从性。尽管大量文献支持动机性访谈,但对于基线依从性高的患者,提醒电话可能是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。需要在依从性较低的参与者中进行重复研究。