Shakur Sophia F, Aletich Victor A, Amin-Hanjani Sepideh, Hussein Ahmed E, Charbel Fady T, Alaraj Ali
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;23(1):34-40. doi: 10.1177/1591019916668842. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
Background Pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) are commonly used for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms but can be associated with delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Although intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic changes have been studied, parent vessel and intracranial hemodynamics after PED use are unknown. We examine the impact of flow diversion on parent artery and distal intracranial hemodynamics. Method Patients with internal carotid cerebral aneurysms treated with PED who had flow volume rate, flow velocities, pulsatility index, resistance index, Lindegaard ratio, and wall shear stress (WSS) obtained after treatment using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography were reviewed. Means were compared between ipsilateral and contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) using paired t tests. Results A total of 18 patients were included. Mean flow volume rate was lower in the ipsilateral versus contralateral ICA ( p = 0.04) but tended to be higher in the ipsilateral versus contralateral MCA ( p = 0.08). Lindegaard ratio was higher ipsilateral to the PED in diastole ( p = 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in flow velocities, pulsatility or resistance indices, and WSS, the two cases in our cohort with hemorrhagic complications did display significant changes in MCA flows and MCA WSS. Conclusion PED placement appears to alter the elasticity of the stented ICA segment, with lower flows in the ipsilateral versus contralateral ICA. Conversely, MCA flows and MCA WSS are higher in the ipsilateral MCA among patients with hemorrhage after PED placement, suggesting the role of disrupted distal hemodynamics in delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhage.
管道栓塞装置(PED)常用于颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗,但可能与同侧迟发性脑实质内出血相关。虽然已对动脉瘤内血流动力学变化进行了研究,但PED使用后供血动脉和颅内血流动力学尚不清楚。我们研究了血流导向对供血动脉和颅内远端血流动力学的影响。
回顾性分析接受PED治疗的颈内动脉颅内动脉瘤患者,这些患者在治疗后通过定量磁共振血管造影获得了血流量、血流速度、搏动指数、阻力指数、林德加德比率和壁面切应力(WSS)。使用配对t检验比较同侧和对侧颈内动脉(ICA)及大脑中动脉(MCA)之间的均值。
共纳入18例患者。同侧ICA的平均血流量低于对侧(p = 0.04),但同侧MCA的平均血流量高于对侧(p = 0.08)。舒张期PED同侧的林德加德比率较高(p = 0.05)。虽然血流速度、搏动或阻力指数以及WSS无显著差异,但我们队列中出现出血并发症的2例患者的MCA血流和MCA WSS确实有显著变化。
PED置入似乎改变了置入支架的ICA节段的弹性,同侧ICA的血流低于对侧。相反,PED置入后出血患者同侧MCA的血流和MCA WSS较高,提示远端血流动力学紊乱在同侧迟发性脑实质内出血中的作用。