Montgomery S, Asberg M, Jörnestedt L, Thorén P, Träskman L, McAuley R, Montgomery D, Shaw P
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):29-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02358.x.
To test the reliability and robustness of the CPRS in use by different disciplines we obtained 49 pairs of ratings on depressed patients in England and Sweden during treatment. Each rater pair consisted of a psychiatrist trained as a rater plus either a psychologist, a general practitioner, or a nurse, who had not been trained as a rater. The 17 most commonly rated items in depressive illness showed good inter-rater reliability for all groups and demonstrated the robustness of the scale even in training sessions. The implications of this for future interdisciplinary research are discussed along with suggestions for the use of the CPRS for teaching purposes.
为测试不同学科使用的临床医师评定量表（CPRS）的可靠性和稳健性，我们在治疗期间获取了英格兰和瑞典49对抑郁症患者的评定结果。每对评定者由一名接受过评定者培训的精神科医生以及一名未接受过评定者培训的心理学家、全科医生或护士组成。抑郁症中17个最常被评定的项目在所有组中均显示出良好的评定者间信度，并且即使在培训过程中也证明了该量表的稳健性。文中讨论了这对未来跨学科研究的意义，并给出了将CPRS用于教学目的的建议。
