• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在英国和瑞典抑郁症患者中使用临床症状自评量表(CPRS)的跨文化研究。

Cross cultural studies on the use of CPRS in English and Swedish depressed patients.

作者信息

Montgomery S, Asberg M, Träskman L, Montgomery D

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):33-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02359.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02359.x
PMID:277056
Abstract

54 English and 52 Swedish patients suffering from primary depressive illness were rated on the full 65 item CPRS scale to examine cross cultural differences. The correlation of the frequencies of items scored in the different patient samples was highly significant (r = 0.88). Of the most commonly scored items (occurring in more than 70% of any of the patient groups) 17 were common to both samples. The three items not in common for the two centres are compared and discussed. The inter rater reliabilities of the Swedish and English teams are compared alongside the inter rater reliabilities of a Swedish rater and an English rater on English patients and are generally good. The remarkable similarity of the psychopathology of primary depressive illness in both cultures and some of the implications are discussed.

摘要

对54名患有原发性抑郁症的英国患者和52名瑞典患者进行了完整的65项CPRS量表评分,以研究跨文化差异。不同患者样本中得分项目的频率相关性非常显著(r = 0.88)。在最常得分的项目(在任何患者组中出现超过70%)中,有17项在两个样本中都很常见。对两个中心不共有的三个项目进行了比较和讨论。比较了瑞典和英国团队的评分者间信度以及瑞典评分者和英国评分者对英国患者的评分者间信度,总体良好。讨论了两种文化中原发性抑郁症精神病理学的显著相似性及其一些影响。

相似文献

1
Cross cultural studies on the use of CPRS in English and Swedish depressed patients.关于在英国和瑞典抑郁症患者中使用临床症状自评量表(CPRS)的跨文化研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):33-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02359.x.
2
Reliability of the CPRS between the disciplines of psychiatry, general practice, nursing and psychology in depressed patients.在抑郁症患者中,精神病学、全科医学、护理学和心理学各学科之间CPRS的可靠性。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):29-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02358.x.
3
The comprehesive psychopathological rating scale--CPRS--in patients with schizophrenic syndromes. Inter-rater reliability and in relation to Mårtens' S-scale.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):39-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02360.x.
4
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change.一种旨在对变化敏感的新型抑郁量表。
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.
5
Standardization and cross-cultural comparisons of the Swedish Conners 3 rating scales.瑞典康纳斯3评定量表的标准化及跨文化比较
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;72(8):613-620. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1513067. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
6
Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.作为基层医疗中抑郁症诊断和预后指标的汉密尔顿抑郁量表的评分者间信度。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Dec;111(2-3):204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
7
A comparison between "Cronholm-Ottosson depression rating scale" and variables concerned with depressive symptomatology in "the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale--CPRS".“克龙霍尔姆 - 奥托森抑郁评定量表”与“综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS)”中与抑郁症状相关变量的比较。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):45-51.
8
Construction of a new psychiatric rating instrument, the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS).一种新的精神病学评定工具——综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS)的构建。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1979;3(4):405-12. doi: 10.1016/0364-7722(79)90055-9.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia.《卡尔加里精神分裂症抑郁量表西班牙语版的跨文化改编与验证》
Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):349-56. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00490-5.
10
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) Checklist: reliability and validity of French version.成人发育障碍患者精神科评估量表(PAS - ADD)检查表:法语版的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):758-65. doi: 10.1111/jir.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of work-related chronic stress on the regulation of emotion and on functional connectivity in the brain.与工作相关的慢性压力对情绪调节及大脑功能连接的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 3;9(9):e104550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104550. eCollection 2014.
2
Instruments to measure behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.用于测量痴呆行为和心理症状的工具。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Mar;23(1):69-98. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1414. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
3
Long-term occupational stress is associated with regional reductions in brain tissue volumes.
长期职业压力与脑组织体积的区域性减少有关。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e64065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064065. Print 2013.
4
Measuring common mental disorders in women in Ethiopia: reliability and construct validity of the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale.埃塞俄比亚女性常见精神障碍的测量:综合精神病理学评定量表的信度和结构效度
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;43(8):653-9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0342-0. Epub 2008 Apr 24.