Gilchrist M D, MacManus D, Murphy J G, Pierrat B
a Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering , University College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland .
b Department of Mechanical Engineering , Dublin City University , Dublin , Ireland .
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Mar;20(4):403-414. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1236371. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
In order to avoid the numerical difficulties in locally enforcing the incompressibility constraint using the displacement formulation of the Finite Element Method, slight compressibility is typically assumed when simulating the mechanical response of arterial tissue. The current standard method of accounting for slight compressibility of hyperelastic soft tissue assumes an additive decomposition of the strain-energy function into a volumetric and a deviatoric part. This has been shown, however, to be inconsistent with the linear theory and results in cubes retaining their cuboid shape under hydrostatic tension and compression, which seems at variance with the reinforcement of arterial tissue with two families of collagen fibres. A remedy for these defects is proposed here, a solution which generalises the current standard model of slight compressibility to include two additional terms, one of which is quadratic in the [Formula: see text] invariants and the other quadratic in [Formula: see text]. Experimental data are used to motivate typical values for the associated material constants of these additional terms. Some simulations are performed to allow contrasts and comparisons to be made between the current standard model of slight compressibility and its generalisation proposed here.
为了避免在使用有限元方法的位移公式局部强制实施不可压缩性约束时出现数值困难,在模拟动脉组织的力学响应时通常假定有轻微的可压缩性。目前考虑超弹性软组织轻微可压缩性的标准方法是假设应变能函数可分解为体积部分和偏量部分。然而,这已被证明与线性理论不一致,并且导致立方体在静水拉伸和压缩下保持其长方体形状,这似乎与具有两族胶原纤维的动脉组织的强化情况不符。本文提出了针对这些缺陷的一种补救方法,即一种将当前轻微可压缩性的标准模型进行推广的解决方案,该方案包括两个附加项,其中一项在[公式:见原文]不变量中是二次的,另一项在[公式:见原文]中是二次的。实验数据用于确定这些附加项相关材料常数的典型值。进行了一些模拟,以便能够对当前轻微可压缩性的标准模型及其本文提出的推广模型进行对比和比较。