Cowan Kyra, Gao Xiaoying, Parab Vaishali, Nguy Trung, Wu Lawren, Arron Joseph R, Townsend Michael, Wallin Jeffrey, Cheu Melissa, Morimoto Alyssa, Wakshull Eric
Genentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Merck & Co, Inc., 901 South California Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Bioanalysis. 2016 Nov;8(22):2329-2340. doi: 10.4155/bio-2016-0184. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
To improve on the efficiency of biomarker assay readiness, and for reliable biomarker data to support three drug programs, we implemented a fit-for-purpose approach, qualifying two biomarker assays and validating a third. Results/methodology: The qualification strategy and selection of experiments for two exploratory biomarkers (CXCL1, CCL19) was determined by the intended use of the biomarker data. The third biomarker, IL-6, was validated as the data would be used in monitoring patient safety during dose-escalation studies in a Phase I trial. All three assays passed a priori acceptance criteria.
These assays highlight strategies and methodologies for a fit-for-purpose approach. Minimum qualification, full qualification and validation were chosen and supported programs at different stages of drug development.
为提高生物标志物检测准备工作的效率,并获得可靠的生物标志物数据以支持三个药物项目,我们采用了一种适用的方法,对两种生物标志物检测方法进行了鉴定,并对第三种进行了验证。结果/方法:两种探索性生物标志物(CXCL1、CCL19)的鉴定策略和实验选择取决于生物标志物数据的预期用途。第三种生物标志物IL-6经过了验证,因为该数据将用于在一项I期试验的剂量递增研究中监测患者安全性。所有三种检测方法均通过了先验验收标准。
这些检测方法突出了适用方法的策略和方法。选择了最低限度鉴定、全面鉴定和验证,并在药物开发的不同阶段为项目提供了支持。