Hu Anning, Qian Zhenchao
Department of Sociology, Fudan University, 831, Liberal Arts Building, Handan Road, Shanghai 200433, China.
Population Studies and Training Center and Department of Sociology, Brown University Maxcy Hall, Box 1916 108 George Street Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Nov;60:148-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 18.
The expansion of higher education witnessed in many societies influences the pattern of educational assortative mating. Structural transition theory predicts growing educational homogamy due to increasing preference for highly-educated partners who become more widely available. In contrast, social closure theory suggests depressed educational homogamy because the inflation of the education elite circle fosters the openness of marriage market, reducing the preference for a highly-educated mate and increasing the penetrability across social-status boundaries. Capitalizing the survey data that are representative of the post-80s one-child generation collected in Shanghai, China, we test the hypotheses derived from the two theories. Empirical results suggest that, with increasing availability of highly educated individuals, the extent of educational homogamy by birth cohort reveals a U-shaped pattern. This U-shaped pattern demonstrates increasing levels of educational homogamy and lends support to structural transition theory.
许多社会中高等教育的扩张影响了教育性择偶的模式。结构转型理论预测,由于对高学历伴侣的偏好增加,而高学历伴侣变得更加普遍,教育同质化会加剧。相比之下,社会封闭理论则表明教育同质化程度会降低,因为教育精英圈子的膨胀促进了婚姻市场的开放性,减少了对高学历配偶的偏好,并增加了跨越社会地位界限的渗透性。利用在中国上海收集的代表80后独生子女一代的调查数据,我们检验了从这两种理论得出的假设。实证结果表明,随着高学历个体的增多,按出生队列划分的教育同质化程度呈现出U形模式。这种U形模式表明教育同质化程度在不断提高,为结构转型理论提供了支持。