Suppr超能文献

发作间期脑电图可预测难治性癫痫患儿迷走神经刺激疗法的疗效。

An interictal EEG can predict the outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy for children with intractable epilepsy.

作者信息

Kim Min-Jee, Yum Mi-Sun, Kim Eun-Hee, Lee Yun-Jeong, Lee Junkyo, Hong Seokho, You Su Jeong, Hwang Yong Soon, Ko Tae-Sung

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea.

Department of Pediatrics, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Pocheon-si, South Korea.

出版信息

Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Jan;33(1):145-151. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3261-5. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy and identify predictive factors for responsiveness to VNS.

METHODS

Medical records of pediatric patients who underwent VNS implantation at two Korean tertiary centers were reviewed. At 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 years post-VNS implantation, the frequency of the most disabling seizures in each patient was assessed. Responders were defined as showing an overall 50 % reduction from baseline seizure frequency during follow-up. The clinical characteristics of responders and non-responders were compared.

RESULTS

Among 58 patients, approximately half (29/58) were responders. The mean age at implantation was 10.9 years (range, 2.7-20.9) and the mean follow-up duration after VNS implantation was 8.4 years (range, 1-15.5). At 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 years after implantation, 43.1, 50.0, 56.9, and 58.1 % of patients exhibited ≥50 % seizure frequency reduction disabling seizures. The patients with focal or multifocal epileptiform discharges were more likely to be responders than those with generalized epileptiform activities by video or conventional EEG at the time of VNS implantation (Pearson's and χ test, p = 0.001). No other clinical variables were found to be associated with seizure outcomes. Wound infections caused VNS removal in two cases. All other adverse events, including cough and hoarseness, were tolerable.

CONCLUSION

VNS is a well-tolerated and effective adjuvant therapy in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy. Notably, patients with focal epileptiform discharges alone rather than those with generalized epileptiform discharges maybe better candidates for VNS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估迷走神经刺激术(VNS)对儿童和青少年难治性癫痫的长期疗效,并确定VNS反应性的预测因素。

方法

回顾了在韩国两家三级医疗中心接受VNS植入的儿科患者的病历。在VNS植入后0.5、1、3和5年,评估每位患者最致残性癫痫发作的频率。反应者定义为在随访期间癫痫发作频率较基线总体降低50%。比较反应者和无反应者的临床特征。

结果

58例患者中,约一半(29/58)为反应者。植入时的平均年龄为10.9岁(范围2.7 - 20.9岁),VNS植入后的平均随访时间为8.4年(范围1 - 15.5年)。植入后0.5、1、3和5年,分别有43.1%、50.0%、56.9%和58.1%的患者癫痫发作频率降低≥50%,致残性癫痫发作减少。在VNS植入时,通过视频或常规脑电图显示有局灶性或多灶性癫痫样放电的患者比有全身性癫痫样活动的患者更有可能成为反应者(Pearson检验和χ检验,p = 0.001)。未发现其他临床变量与癫痫发作结果相关。伤口感染导致2例患者VNS移除。所有其他不良事件,包括咳嗽和声音嘶哑,均可耐受。

结论

VNS是儿童难治性癫痫患者耐受性良好且有效的辅助治疗方法。值得注意的是,仅患有局灶性癫痫样放电的患者而非全身性癫痫样放电的患者可能是VNS的更好候选者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验