• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies.患有口面部异常的儿童的儿童口腔健康影响概况的最小重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Oct 3;14(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1.
2
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Young Adolescent Orthodontic Cleft Patients.儿童和青少年正畸腭裂患者的口腔健康相关生活质量
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Aug;98 Suppl 7:S84-91.
3
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Children in Chile Treated for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Case-Control Approach.智利唇腭裂患儿的口腔健康相关生活质量:病例对照研究方法
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Mar;54(2):e15-e20. doi: 10.1597/15-095. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
4
Oral health-related quality of life in children with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂患儿的口腔健康相关生活质量
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):e340-3. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828b743b.
5
Evaluation of the similarities and differences in response patterns to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory and the Child Oral Health Impact Scores among youth with cleft.评价不同年龄段唇腭裂患者对儿童生存质量量表和儿童口腔健康影响量表的反应模式的异同。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0450-5. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
6
Oral health-related quality of life in children with orofacial clefts.患有口腔颌面裂的儿童的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 Mar;50(2):174-81. doi: 10.1597/11-055. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
7
Development and validation of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile - Preschool version.儿童口腔健康影响量表 - 学龄前版的开发与验证
Community Dent Health. 2017 Sep;34(3):176-182. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4110Ruff07.
8
Validity and reliability of the COHIP-SF in Australian children with orofacial cleft.COHIP-SF 在澳大利亚口面裂儿童中的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Nov;27(6):574-582. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12329. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
9
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Chinese Children With Orofacial Cleft.中文腭裂儿童的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Aug;57(8):931-937. doi: 10.1177/1055665620908426. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
10
The Impact of Type-D Personality on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Cleft Lip and Palate Adolescents.D型人格对唇腭裂青少年口腔健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Mar;29(2):289-292. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004093.

引用本文的文献

1
Silver diamine fluoride, atraumatic restorations, and oral health-related quality of life in children aged 5-13 years: results from the CariedAway school-based cluster randomized trial.银氨氟化物、非创伤性修复治疗与 5-13 岁儿童的口腔健康相关生活质量:来自 CariedAway 基于学校的整群随机试验的结果。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02159-5.
2
Velopharyngeal Inadequacy-Related Quality of Life Assessment: The Instrument Development and Application Review.腭咽功能不全相关生活质量评估:工具开发与应用综述
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 8;9:796941. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.796941. eCollection 2022.
3
Mothers' sense of coherence and oral health-related quality of life in cleft lip and palate children visiting a private dental college: A Survey.私立牙科学院唇腭裂患儿母亲的连贯感与口腔健康相关生活质量:一项调查
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):4386-4390. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1129_19. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Quality-of-Life in Children with Orofacial Clefts and Caregiver Well-being.患有口面部裂隙儿童的生活质量与照顾者的幸福感
J Dent Res. 2017 Dec;96(13):1474-1481. doi: 10.1177/0022034517725707. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Challenges in conducting multicentre, multidisciplinary, longitudinal studies in children with chronic conditions.对患有慢性病的儿童开展多中心、多学科纵向研究的挑战。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;45(4):317-322. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12293. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings.接受唇腭裂相关手术的青少年的口腔健康相关生活质量:自我报告与代理评分
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):859-867. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1420-5. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating a minimal clinically important difference for the EuroQol 5-Dimension health status index in persons with multiple sclerosis.估算多发性硬化症患者的欧洲五维健康量表健康状况指数的最小临床重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 5;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-66.
2
An overview of children's oral health-related quality of life assessment: from scale development to measuring outcomes.儿童口腔健康相关生活质量评估概述:从量表制定到测量结果。
Caries Res. 2013;47 Suppl 1(0 1):13-21. doi: 10.1159/000351693. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
3
Evaluation of the similarities and differences in response patterns to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory and the Child Oral Health Impact Scores among youth with cleft.评价不同年龄段唇腭裂患者对儿童生存质量量表和儿童口腔健康影响量表的反应模式的异同。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0450-5. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
4
Need of minimal important difference for oral health-related quality of life measures.口腔健康相关生活质量测量的最小重要差异需求。
J Public Health Dent. 2014 Winter;74(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00374.x. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
5
Interpreting oral health-related quality of life data.解读口腔健康相关生活质量数据。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;40(3):193-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00651.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
6
Development and initial validation of the barriers to diabetes adherence measure for adolescents.青少年糖尿病遵嘱行为障碍量表的编制及初步验证。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;94(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
7
Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006.2004 - 2006年美国部分出生缺陷的最新全国出生患病率估计
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1008-16. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20735. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
8
Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems.两种常用足部问题结局测量工具的最小临床重要差值。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 May 14;3:7. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-7.
9
Qualitative approaches in craniofacial research.颅面研究中的定性方法。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 May;46(3):245-51. doi: 10.1597/08-121.1. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
10
Changes in parent-assessed oral health-related quality of life among young children following dental treatment under general anaesthetic.全身麻醉下接受牙科治疗的幼儿中,家长评估的与口腔健康相关的生活质量变化。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;36(2):108-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00374.x.

患有口面部异常的儿童的儿童口腔健康影响概况的最小重要差异。

Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies.

作者信息

Ruff Ryan Richard, Sischo Lacey, Broder Hillary L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, 433 First Avenue, Room 712, New York, NY, USA.

College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Oct 3;14(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1
PMID:27716239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5048688/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) of the COHIP for patients with cleft lip/palate.

METHODS

Data from a 6-year, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of children with cleft lip/palate were analyzed to estimate the MID. Analysis was restricted to patients with data at baseline and first follow-up and not receiving a surgical intervention in the intervening years (N = 281). MIDs were estimated via the anchor-based method, using the Global Assessment of Change, and the effect size distribution method.

RESULTS

Based on the distributional method, the minimally important differences were 0.16 (oral health), 0.12 (functional), 0.22 (social-emotional), 0.21 (school environment) and 0.19 (self-image). MID anchor estimates for COHIP domains ranged from -0.32 to 0.84. The anchor-based and effect size MID estimates for the overall COHIP score were 2.95 and 0.25, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile is recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful change in patients with cleft lip/palate.

摘要

背景

儿童口腔健康影响量表(COHIP)是一种用于测量8至15岁儿童自我报告的口腔健康相关生活质量的工具,包括口腔健康、功能福祉、社会情感福祉、学校环境和自我形象等领域。本研究的目的是估计唇腭裂患者COHIP的最小重要差异(MID)。

方法

对一项针对唇腭裂儿童的为期6年的前瞻性纵向队列研究的数据进行分析,以估计MID。分析仅限于在基线和首次随访时有数据且在中间年份未接受手术干预的患者(N = 281)。通过基于锚定的方法,使用总体变化评估和效应量分布方法来估计MID。

结果

基于分布方法,最小重要差异分别为0.16(口腔健康)、0.12(功能)、0.22(社会情感)、0.21(学校环境)和0.19(自我形象)。COHIP各领域的MID锚定估计值范围为-0.32至0.84。总体COHIP评分的基于锚定和效应量的MID估计值分别为2.95和0.25。

结论

推荐使用儿童口腔健康影响量表的最小重要差异来解释唇腭裂患者临床上有意义的变化。