• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings.接受唇腭裂相关手术的青少年的口腔健康相关生活质量:自我报告与代理评分
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):859-867. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1420-5. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
2
Changes in the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate Before and After Surgical Treatment.唇腭裂婴儿手术治疗前后口腔健康相关生活质量的变化。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Jan;59(1):47-53. doi: 10.1177/1055665621993282. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
3
Oral health-related quality of life changes in standard, cleft, and surgery patients after orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗后标准患者、腭裂患者及接受手术患者的口腔健康相关生活质量变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Oct;148(4):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.028.
4
Evaluation of the similarities and differences in response patterns to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory and the Child Oral Health Impact Scores among youth with cleft.评价不同年龄段唇腭裂患者对儿童生存质量量表和儿童口腔健康影响量表的反应模式的异同。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0450-5. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Examination of a theoretical model for oral health-related quality of life among youths with cleft.腭裂青少年口腔健康相关生活质量的理论模型研究
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):865-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301686. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
6
Long-term changes in oral health-related quality of life of standard, cleft, and surgery patients after orthodontic treatment: A longitudinal study.正畸治疗后标准患者、腭裂患者及接受手术患者口腔健康相关生活质量的长期变化:一项纵向研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Feb;153(2):224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.018.
7
Examining factors associated with oral health-related quality of life for youth with cleft.检查与唇腭裂青年口腔健康相关生活质量相关的因素。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):828e-834e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000221.
8
Resiliency and socioemotional functioning in youth receiving surgery for orofacial anomalies.接受口面部畸形手术的青少年的复原力和社会情感功能。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;44(4):371-80. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12222. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
Orthodontic Status and Association with Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life-A Study of 16-Year-Old Norwegians with a Cleft Lip and Palate.正畸状况及其与口腔健康相关生活质量的关系——一项对 16 岁唇腭裂挪威人的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 26;21(5):550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050550.
10
Validating and assessing the oral health-related quality of life among Hungarian children with cleft lip and palate using Child-OIDP scale.采用儿童口腔健康影响生计调查问卷(Child-OIDP)评估和验证匈牙利唇腭裂儿童的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021 Feb;22(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00525-x. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Syndromic Persian Toddlers with Orofacial Clefts Undergoing Team Care and Compared with a Control Group.对接受团队护理的非综合征性波斯裔口面部裂隙幼儿的健康相关生活质量进行评估,并与对照组进行比较。
Iran J Child Neurol. 2025;19(2):39-49. doi: 10.22037/ijcn.v19i2.45318. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
Impact of Multidisciplinary Cleft Team Care on Oral Health Quality of Life in Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Focus on Early Intervention vs. Sporadic Treatment.多学科唇腭裂团队护理对单侧唇腭裂儿童口腔健康生活质量的影响:聚焦早期干预与间断治疗
Int J Dent. 2025 Mar 19;2025:1642111. doi: 10.1155/ijod/1642111. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy of modified anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis based on 3D visualisation for the treatment of maxillary hypoplasia among adolescents with cleft lip and palate.基于 3D 可视化的改良上颌前段节段性牵引成骨术治疗唇腭裂青少年上颌发育不全的疗效。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04828-z.
4
The Impact of COVID-19 on Parental Perception of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Children: A Comparison of a Sample from Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.新冠疫情对父母对儿童口腔健康相关生活质量认知的影响:沙特阿拉伯和科威特样本的比较
Int J Dent. 2023 Jul 18;2023:9983979. doi: 10.1155/2023/9983979. eCollection 2023.
5
Finnish Translation and Linguistic Validation of the CLEFT-Q Questionnaire.《CLEFT-Q 问卷的芬兰语翻译与语言学验证》。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jul;61(7):1081-1086. doi: 10.1177/10556656231162454. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
6
Influence of Cleft Lip and Palate on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Northern Italy: Exploring Both the Children's and Caregivers' Perspectives.唇腭裂对意大利北部口腔健康相关生活质量的影响:探索儿童和照料者的观点。
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 17;9(12):1986. doi: 10.3390/children9121986.
7
Follow-Up Care Barriers for Patients with Orofacial Clefts.唇腭裂患者的随访护理障碍。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Oct;59(10):1213-1221. doi: 10.1177/10556656211042162. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Perception of quality of life by children and adolescents with cleft lip/palate after orthodontic and surgical treatment: gender and age analysis.唇腭裂儿童及青少年正畸和外科治疗后生活质量感知:性别与年龄分析
Prog Orthod. 2021 Apr 1;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00354-8.
9
Oral health-related quality of life among young adults with cleft in northern Finland.芬兰北部腭裂青年的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Jun;6(3):305-310. doi: 10.1002/cre2.284. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
Quality of life, work ability, and facial deformities.生活质量、工作能力与面部畸形。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2018 Sep 1;16(3):318-326. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520180278. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Surgical Risk and Outcomes Following Palatoplasty: An Analysis of the NSQIP Pediatric Database.种族和民族对腭裂修复术后手术风险和结果的影响:NSQIP 儿科数据库分析。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Jun;60(6):663-670. doi: 10.1177/10556656221078154. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies.患有口面部异常的儿童的儿童口腔健康影响概况的最小重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Oct 3;14(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1.
3
Resiliency and socioemotional functioning in youth receiving surgery for orofacial anomalies.接受口面部畸形手术的青少年的复原力和社会情感功能。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;44(4):371-80. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12222. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
4
Surgeon's and Caregivers' Appraisals of Primary Cleft Lip Treatment with and without Nasoalveolar Molding: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study.外科医生和护理人员对唇裂一期治疗(有无鼻牙槽塑形)的评估:一项前瞻性多中心试点研究
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):938-945. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479979.83169.57.
5
Body Image and Quality of Life in Adolescents With Craniofacial Conditions.颅面疾病青少年的身体意象与生活质量
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Jan;54(1):2-12. doi: 10.1597/15-167. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
6
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Self-Rated Speech in Children With Existing Fistulas in Mid-Childhood and Adolescence.患有中期儿童期和青春期现存瘘管的儿童的口腔健康相关生活质量和自评言语
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Nov;53(6):664-669. doi: 10.1597/15-123. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: A mixed method approach.照顾者对早期腭裂护理的反应:一种混合方法研究
Health Psychol. 2016 May;35(5):474-82. doi: 10.1037/hea0000262. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
Risk and Protective Factors at Age 16: Psychological Adjustment in Children With a Cleft Lip and/or Palate.16岁时的风险与保护因素:唇腭裂患儿的心理调适
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 Sep;52(5):555-73. doi: 10.1597/14-063. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
Examining factors associated with oral health-related quality of life for youth with cleft.检查与唇腭裂青年口腔健康相关生活质量相关的因素。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):828e-834e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000221.
10
Measurement of health-related and oral health-related quality of life among individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非综合征性口腔颌面部裂隙患者健康相关及口腔健康相关生活质量的测量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 Mar;52(2):157-72. doi: 10.1597/13-104. Epub 2014 May 7.

接受唇腭裂相关手术的青少年的口腔健康相关生活质量:自我报告与代理评分

Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings.

作者信息

Broder Hillary L, Wilson-Genderson Maureen, Sischo Lacey

机构信息

Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, New York University College of Dentistry, 137 E. 25th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10010, USA.

Department of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):859-867. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1420-5. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-016-1420-5
PMID:27699557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5336514/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This paper evaluated the impact of cleft-related surgery on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of youth with cleft over time.

METHODS

Data were derived from a 5-year, multi-center, prospective, longitudinal study of 1196 youth with cleft lip and/or palate and their caregivers. Eligible youth were between 7.5 and 18.5 years old, spoke English or Spanish, and were non-syndromic. During each observational period, which included baseline, and 1- and 2-year post-baseline follow-up visits, youths and their caregivers completed the Child Oral Health Impact Profile, a validated measure of OHRQoL. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of receipt of craniofacial surgery on OHRQoL over time.

RESULTS

During the course of this study a total of 516 patients (43 %) received at least one surgery. Youth in the surgery recommendation group had lower self- (β = -2.18, p < 0.05) and proxy-rated (β = -2.92, p < 0.02) OHRQoL when compared to non-surgical self- and proxy-rated OHRQoL at baseline. Both surgical and non-surgical youth (β = 3.73, p < 0.001) and caregiver (β = 1.91, p < 0.05) ratings of OHRQoL improved over time. There was significant incremental improvement (time × surgery interaction) in self-reported OHRQoL for youth postsurgery (β = 1.04, p < 0.05), but this postsurgery increment was not seen in the caregiver proxy ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention impacts OHRQoL among youth with cleft. Youth who were surgical candidates had lower baseline self- and caregiver-rated OHRQoL when compared to non-surgical youth. Youth who underwent cleft-related surgery had significant incremental improvements in self-rated but not caregiver (proxy)-rated OHRQoL after surgery.

摘要

目的

本文评估了唇腭裂相关手术对唇腭裂青少年口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)随时间的影响。

方法

数据来自一项针对1196名唇裂和/或腭裂青少年及其照顾者的为期5年的多中心前瞻性纵向研究。符合条件的青少年年龄在7.5至18.5岁之间,说英语或西班牙语,且非综合征性。在每个观察期,包括基线期以及基线后1年和2年的随访中,青少年及其照顾者完成了儿童口腔健康影响量表,这是一种经过验证的OHRQoL测量方法。使用多水平混合效应模型分析接受颅面手术对OHRQoL随时间的影响。

结果

在本研究过程中,共有516名患者(43%)接受了至少一次手术。与基线时非手术青少年的自我和代理评定的OHRQoL相比,手术推荐组的青少年自我评定(β = -2.18,p < 0.05)和代理评定(β = -2.92,p < 0.02)的OHRQoL较低。手术组和非手术组青少年(β = 3.73,p < 0.001)及其照顾者(β = 1.91,p < 0.05)对OHRQoL的评定随时间均有改善。青少年术后自我报告的OHRQoL有显著的增量改善(时间×手术交互作用,β = 1.04,p < 0.05),但在照顾者的代理评定中未观察到这种术后增量。

结论

手术干预对唇腭裂青少年的OHRQoL有影响。与非手术青少年相比,手术候选青少年的基线自我和照顾者评定的OHRQoL较低。接受唇腭裂相关手术的青少年术后自我评定的OHRQoL有显著的增量改善,但照顾者(代理)评定的OHRQoL没有。