Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Italy.
Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Italy.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
This study investigated the predictive validity of the ten Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) variables from the Stress and Distress domain, by testing whether they predicted increased sympathetic reactivity to a mild, laboratory-induced stress, occurred one week after Rorschach administration. A relatively small student sample (N=52) contributed to this research: During a first meeting (T1) participants were administered the Rorschach task according to R-PAS guidelines; about one week later (T2) their electrodermal activity (EDA) was recorded during exposure to a mild laboratory stress-inducing task. Based on literature indicating that exposure to stress tends to increase physiological vulnerability/reactivity to stressful situations, we anticipated that Stress and Distress R-PAS variables measured at T1 would positively correlate with increased sympathetic reactivity to stress at T2, as indicated by greater EDA changes from baseline to stress and recovery. Results partially confirmed our hypotheses: (a) the mean of and (b) the majority of the Stress and Distress R-PAS variables were significantly correlated, in the expected direction, with medium and medium to large effect sizes.
本研究通过测试应激和困扰领域的 10 项罗夏绩效评估系统(R-PAS)变量是否能预测罗夏测验后一周轻度实验室诱发应激时交感反应增加,考察了这些变量的预测效度。这项研究的参与者是相对较少的学生(N=52):在第一次会面(T1)中,参与者根据 R-PAS 指南完成罗夏测验;大约一周后(T2),他们在暴露于轻度实验室应激诱发任务时的皮肤电活动(EDA)被记录下来。基于文献表明,暴露于应激会增加对紧张情况的生理脆弱性/反应性,我们预计 T1 测量的应激和困扰 R-PAS 变量将与 T2 时对压力的交感反应增加呈正相关,表现为 EDA 从基线到压力和恢复时的变化更大。结果部分证实了我们的假设:(a)平均值和(b)应激和困扰 R-PAS 变量中的大多数与中等和中到大效应量呈预期方向相关。