• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can the Rorschach be Administered Remotely? A Review of Options and a Pilot Study Using a Newly Developed R-PAS App.罗夏墨迹测验能否远程实施?对多种选项的综述以及使用新开发的R-PAS应用程序的一项初步研究
Psychol Inj Law. 2022 Mar 16:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12207-022-09447-z.
2
Effects of Covid-19 Emergency and Associated Lockdown Policies on the Normative Expectations for the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS).
J Pers Assess. 2024 Jul-Aug;106(4):448-458. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2289461. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
The Impact of R-Optimized Administration Modeling Procedures on Brazilian Normative Reference Values for Rorschach Scores.R优化施测建模程序对罗夏测验分数巴西常模参考值的影响。
J Pers Assess. 2016 Jul-Aug;98(4):408-18. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1148701. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
An Interrater Reliability Study of Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Raw and Complexity-Adjusted Scores.罗夏墨迹测验表现评估系统(R-PAS)原始分数与复杂度调整分数的评分者间信度研究。
J Pers Assess. 2017 Nov-Dec;99(6):619-625. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1296844. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Does the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Differ from the Comprehensive System (CS) on Variables Relevant to Interpretation?罗夏墨迹测验表现评估系统(R-PAS)与综合系统(CS)在与解释相关的变量上是否存在差异?
J Pers Assess. 2021 Jan-Feb;103(1):132-147. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1677678. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
The Effect of CS Administration or an R-Optimized Alternative on R-PAS Variables: A Meta-Analysis of Findings From Six Studies.CS 给药或 R-最优替代方案对 R-PAS 变量的影响:六项研究结果的荟萃分析。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Mar-Apr;101(2):199-212. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1393430. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Complexity and Cognitive Engagement in the Rorschach Task: An Eye-Tracking Study.罗夏墨迹测验任务中的复杂性与认知参与度:一项眼动追踪研究
J Pers Assess. 2020 Jul-Aug;102(4):538-550. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1575227. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
8
Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) and vulnerability to stress: A preliminary study on electrodermal activity during stress.罗夏墨迹测试评估系统(R-PAS)与应激易感性:应激时皮肤电活动的初步研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
9
Cultural and linguistic adaptability of the Rorschach Performance Assessment System as a measure of psychotic characteristics and severity of mental disturbance in Taiwan.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1273-85. doi: 10.1037/pas0000144. Epub 2015 May 25.
10
Potential Projective Material on the Rorschach: Comparing Comprehensive System Protocols to Their Modeled R-Optimized Administration Counterparts.罗夏墨迹测验中的潜在投射材料:比较综合系统协议与其模拟的R优化施测对应版本。
J Pers Assess. 2016 Jul-Aug;98(4):398-407. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1147451. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye Movements During Pareidolia: Exploring Biomarkers for Thinking and Perception Problems on the Rorschach.空想性错视期间的眼球运动:探索罗夏墨迹测验中思维与感知问题的生物标志物。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Jul 22;18(4):32. doi: 10.3390/jemr18040032. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Neuroanatomical and psychological considerations in temporal lobe epilepsy.颞叶癫痫的神经解剖学与心理学考量
Front Neuroanat. 2022 Dec 14;16:995286. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2022.995286. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Legal Admissibility of the Rorschach and R-PAS: A Review of Research, Practice, and Case Law.罗夏墨迹测验和罗夏综合系统的法律可采性:研究、实践与判例法综述
J Pers Assess. 2022 Mar-Apr;104(2):137-161. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2028795. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Testing Our Children When the World Shuts Down: Analyzing Recommendations for Adapted Tele-Assessment during COVID-19.当世界停摆时对我们的孩子进行测试:分析新冠疫情期间适应性远程评估的建议
J Psychoeduc Assess. 2020 Dec;38(8):923-941. doi: 10.1177/0734282920962839. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
3
Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29.问题清单29在线版与面对面施测的可比性和效度
Psychol Inj Law. 2021;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) Interrater Reliability in a Brazilian Adolescent Sample and Comparisons With Three Other Studies.罗夏墨迹测验评估系统(R-PAS)在巴西青少年样本中的评分者间信度及与其他三项研究的比较。
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):859-871. doi: 10.1177/1073191120973075. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
5
Complexity and Cognitive Engagement in the Rorschach Task: An fMRI Study.复杂性与罗夏测验中的认知投入:一项 fMRI 研究。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Sep-Oct;103(5):634-644. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1842429. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
6
Forensic mental telehealth assessment (FMTA) in the context of COVID-19.在 COVID-19 背景下的法医心理远程医疗评估(FMTA)。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;71:101595. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101595. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Equivalence of remote, digital administration and traditional, in-person administration of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V).远程、数字化施测与传统的韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)面对面施测等效性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep;32(9):809-817. doi: 10.1037/pas0000939. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Validity of teleneuropsychology for older adults in response to COVID-19: A systematic and critical review.远程神经心理学在应对 COVID-19 中的老年人中的有效性:系统和批判性评价。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct-Nov;34(7-8):1411-1452. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1769192. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care.远程医疗转型:COVID-19 与虚拟医疗的兴起。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):957-962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067.
10
Telepsychiatry Use in U.S. Mental Health Facilities, 2010-2017.2010-2017 年美国精神卫生机构中的远程精神病学使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Feb 1;71(2):121-127. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900261. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

罗夏墨迹测验能否远程实施?对多种选项的综述以及使用新开发的R-PAS应用程序的一项初步研究

Can the Rorschach be Administered Remotely? A Review of Options and a Pilot Study Using a Newly Developed R-PAS App.

作者信息

Ales Francesca, Meyer Gregory J, Mihura Joni L, Loia Andrea Corgiat, Pasqualini Sara, Zennaro Alessandro, Giromini Luciano

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10123 Turin, TO Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH USA.

出版信息

Psychol Inj Law. 2022 Mar 16:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12207-022-09447-z.

DOI:10.1007/s12207-022-09447-z
PMID:35308458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8923744/
Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has required psychologists to adopt measures like physical distancing and mask wearing, though other safety procedures such as travel restrictions or prohibitions on in-person practice and research have fostered the use of tele-health tools. In this article, we review options for using the Rorschach task via videoconference and provide preliminary data from using a new electronic app for remote R-PAS administration to determine whether the remote administration in an electronic form yields different information than in-person administration with the cards in hand. As a pilot study, our focus is on the "first factor" of all Rorschach scores, i.e., complexity. Data were collected from 60 adult Italian community volunteers, and statistical analyses evaluated the extent to which the average complexity score significantly departed from R-PAS normative expectations (SS = 100), accompanied by Bayesian likelihoods for supporting the null hypothesis. Results suggest that the general level of complexity shown by the test-takers when administered the Rorschach remotely with the new R-PAS app closely resembles that previously observed using "standard" in-person procedures. Tentative analyses of other R-PAS scores suggested normative departures that could be due to the effects of the app, testing at home, or responses to the pandemic. We offer recommendations for future research and discuss practical implications.

摘要

持续的新冠疫情要求心理学家采取诸如保持社交距离和佩戴口罩等措施,不过其他安全程序,如旅行限制或禁止面对面实践与研究,促使了远程医疗工具的使用。在本文中,我们回顾了通过视频会议使用罗夏测验任务的选项,并提供了使用一款用于远程进行罗夏综合系统(R-PAS)施测的新电子应用程序的初步数据,以确定电子形式的远程施测与手持卡片进行面对面施测是否会产生不同的信息。作为一项试点研究,我们关注的是所有罗夏测验分数的“第一因素”,即复杂性。数据收集自60名意大利成年社区志愿者,统计分析评估了平均复杂性分数显著偏离罗夏综合系统常模预期(SS = 100)的程度,同时给出了支持零假设的贝叶斯似然比。结果表明,使用新的罗夏综合系统应用程序对受试者进行远程罗夏测验时,所显示的复杂性总体水平与之前使用“标准”面对面程序观察到的情况非常相似。对其他罗夏综合系统分数的初步分析表明,可能由于应用程序的影响、在家中进行测试或对疫情的反应,出现了与常模的偏差。我们为未来的研究提供了建议,并讨论了实际意义。