Fliedl Rainer, Katzenschläger Petra
Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin, Psychotherapie und Kindheitsforschung, LK Baden-Mödling, Abteilung für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie Hinterbrühl, Karl Landsteiner Gesellschaft, Fürstenweg 8, 2371, Hinterbrühl, Österreich.
Neuropsychiatr. 2016 Sep;30(3):151-157. doi: 10.1007/s40211-016-0201-2. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
The aim of this study was to compare the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD-CA) for children and adolescents with the modified version (OPD-CA-2) focusing on the mainly unchanged treatment conditions and the redesigned structure axis.
The patient sample consisted 371 inpatient children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders from 3 to 18 years. OPD-CA and OPD-CA-2 diagnostics were routinely performed by OPD-experienced raters. Statistical calculation included Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and confirmatory factor analysis.
The OPD-CA-2 structure axis showed very good internal consistency (reliability) compared to the OPD-CA. We found satisfactorily good values for the treatment conditions with slightly higher average scores in the OPD-CA-2. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in two models where the items on the OPD-CA-2 structure axis were stronger correlated than those of the OPD-CA.
The OPD-CA-2 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing treatment conditions and psychic structure in children and adolescents. The reorganization of the structure axis and the treatment conditions in the OPD-CA-2 resulted in a measurable improvement.
本研究旨在比较儿童和青少年操作性心理动力诊断(OPD-CA)与修订版(OPD-CA-2),重点关注基本未变的治疗条件和重新设计的结构轴。
患者样本包括371名3至18岁患有精神疾病的住院儿童和青少年。OPD-CA和OPD-CA-2诊断由有OPD经验的评估者常规进行。统计计算包括克朗巴哈系数(内部一致性)和验证性因素分析。
与OPD-CA相比,OPD-CA-2结构轴显示出非常好的内部一致性(可靠性)。我们发现治疗条件的值令人满意,OPD-CA-2的平均得分略高。验证性因素分析得出两个模型,其中OPD-CA-2结构轴上的项目比OPD-CA的项目相关性更强。
OPD-CA-2是评估儿童和青少年治疗条件和心理结构的可靠且有效的工具。OPD-CA-2中结构轴和治疗条件的重新组织带来了可衡量的改进。