Sjögren B, Uddenberg N
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Prenat Diagn. 1989 Jul;9(7):477-87. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970090705.
The psychological reactions of 211 women undergoing prenatal diagnosis (PND) with amniocentesis (group A, n = 122) or chorionic villus biopsy (group V, n = 90) were examined by questionnaires and interviews. The distress experienced while waiting for the test, during the test procedure, and while waiting for the result was reported by the women, both in questionnaires and in interviews. In the questionnaires, no difference between the two diagnostic methods was observed. In the interviews, however, the women undergoing amniocentesis appeared significantly more distressed by the procedure. In group A 97 per cent and in group V 100 per cent wished a method which, like chorionic villus biopsy, could be used in the first weeks of pregnancy. The risk of miscarriage was, as described in other studies, regarded as a serious threat by the pregnant women.
通过问卷调查和访谈,对211名接受羊膜穿刺术产前诊断(A组,n = 122)或绒毛取样(V组,n = 90)的女性的心理反应进行了研究。女性们在问卷和访谈中报告了在等待检查、检查过程中以及等待结果期间所经历的痛苦。在问卷中,未观察到两种诊断方法之间存在差异。然而,在访谈中,接受羊膜穿刺术的女性在该过程中表现出明显更多的痛苦。A组中有97%,V组中有100%的女性希望有一种像绒毛取样一样可在怀孕初期使用的方法。正如其他研究中所描述的,流产风险被孕妇视为严重威胁。