• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后30天死亡率风险预测模型的描述。

Description of a risk predictive model of 30-day postoperative mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

作者信息

Eslami Mohammad H, Rybin Denis V, Doros Gheorghe, Farber Alik

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):65-74.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.103. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.103
PMID:27720320
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite vast improvement in the field of vascular surgery, elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair still leads to perioperative death. Patients with asymptomatic AAAs, therefore, would benefit from an individual risk assessment to help with decisions regarding operative intervention. The purpose of this study was to describe such a 30-day postoperative (POD) risk prediction model using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) data.

METHODS

The NSQIP database (2005-2011) was queried for patients undergoing elective AAA repair using open or endovascular techniques. Clinical variables and known predictors of mortality were included in a full prediction model. These variables included procedure type, patient's age, functional dependence and comorbidities, and surgeon's specialty. Backward elimination with alpha-level of 0.2 was used to construct a parsimonious model. Model discrimination was evaluated in equally sized risk quintiles.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate for 18,917 elective AAA patients was 1.7%. In this model, surgeon's specialty was not predictive of POD. The most significant factors affecting POD included open repair (odds ratio [OR], 2.712; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.119-3.469; P < .001), age >70 (OR, 2.243; 95% CI, 1.695-3.033; P < .001), functional dependency (OR, 2.290; 95% CI, 1.442-3.637; P < .001), creatinine above 2.0 mg/dL (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.403-3.142; P < .001) and low hematocrit levels (OR, 2.157; 95% CI, 1.365-3.408; P = .001).The discriminating ability of the NSQIP model was reasonable (C-statistic = 0.751) and corrected to 0.736 after internal validation. The NSQIP model performed well predicting mortality among risk-group quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The NSQIP risk prediction model is a robust vehicle to predict POD among patient undergoing elective AAA repair. This model can be used for risk stratification of patients undergoing elective AAA repair.

摘要

目的

尽管血管外科领域有了巨大进步,但择期腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术仍会导致围手术期死亡。因此,无症状AAA患者将受益于个体风险评估,以帮助做出有关手术干预的决策。本研究的目的是使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进项目(NSQIP)的数据描述这样一个术后30天(POD)风险预测模型。

方法

查询NSQIP数据库(2005 - 2011年)中接受开放或血管内技术择期AAA修复术的患者。临床变量和已知的死亡预测因素被纳入一个完整预测模型。这些变量包括手术类型、患者年龄、功能依赖和合并症以及外科医生的专业。使用α水平为0.2的向后剔除法构建一个简约模型。在大小相等的风险五分位数中评估模型的辨别力。

结果

18917例择期AAA患者的总体死亡率为1.7%。在这个模型中,外科医生的专业不能预测POD。影响POD的最显著因素包括开放修复(比值比[OR],2.712;95%置信区间[CI],2.119 - 3.469;P <.001)、年龄>70岁(OR,2.243;95% CI,1.695 - 3.033;P <.001)、功能依赖(OR,2.290;95% CI,1.442 - 3.637;P <.001)、肌酐高于2.0mg/dL(OR,2.1;95% CI,1.403 - 3.142;P <.001)和低血细胞比容水平(OR,2.157;95% CI,1.365 - 3.408;P =.001)。NSQIP模型的辨别能力合理(C统计量 = 0.751),内部验证后校正为0.736。NSQIP模型在预测风险组五分位数中的死亡率方面表现良好。

结论

NSQIP风险预测模型是预测择期AAA修复术患者POD的有力工具。该模型可用于择期AAA修复术患者的风险分层。

相似文献

1
Description of a risk predictive model of 30-day postoperative mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后30天死亡率风险预测模型的描述。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):65-74.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.103. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
2
Comparison of a Vascular Study Group of New England risk prediction model with established risk prediction models of in-hospital mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.新英格兰血管研究组风险预测模型与择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后院内死亡既定风险预测模型的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1125-33.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.051. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
External validation of Vascular Study Group of New England risk predictive model of mortality after elective abdominal aorta aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative and comparison against established models.血管研究组新英格兰风险预测模型在外科学会血管质量倡议中的择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后死亡率的外部验证,并与现有模型进行比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.087. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
4
The age effect in increasing operative mortality following delay in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复延迟后手术死亡率增加中的年龄效应。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;29(6):1181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.041. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
Outcomes for symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划中症状性腹主动脉瘤的治疗结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.055. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
The association of perioperative transfusion with 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.围手术期输血与接受大血管手术患者30天发病率和死亡率的相关性。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):1000-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.106. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Statistically Corrected Operative Risk Evaluation (AAA SCORE) for predicting mortality after open and endovascular interventions.用于预测开放和血管内介入治疗后死亡率的腹主动脉瘤统计校正手术风险评估(AAA SCORE)。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
8
Mortality variability after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a large tertiary vascular center using a Medicare-derived risk prediction model.在一家大型三级血管中心,使用源自医疗保险的风险预测模型比较血管内修复与开放性腹主动脉瘤修复后的死亡率变异性。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.078. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
9
Predictors of outcome after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and external validation of a risk prediction model.择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后结局的预测因素和风险预测模型的外部验证。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):644-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.217. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
10
Predicting 1-year mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后1年死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Apr;49(4):838-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.10.067.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting outcomes following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using machine learning.使用机器学习预测开放性腹主动脉瘤修复后的结果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98573-0.
2
Factors associated with nonhome discharge after endovascular aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术后非回家出院的相关因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;81(1):137-147.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.060. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Development and Comparison of Multimodal Models for Preoperative Prediction of Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
血管内动脉瘤修复术后结局术前预测多模态模型的开发与比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 26;9:870132. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.870132. eCollection 2022.
4
The physiological and clinical importance of cardiorespiratory fitness in people with abdominal aortic aneurysm.心肺适能对腹主动脉瘤患者的生理和临床重要性。
Exp Physiol. 2022 Apr;107(4):283-298. doi: 10.1113/EP089710. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
Effects of active smoking on postoperative outcomes in hospitalised patients undergoing elective surgery: a retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database in Japan.主动吸烟对择期手术住院患者术后结局的影响:日本一项行政索赔数据库的回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 1;9(10):e029913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029913.