• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内动脉瘤修复术后非回家出院的相关因素。

Factors associated with nonhome discharge after endovascular aneurysm repair.

作者信息

Straus Sabrina, Gomez-Mayorga Jorge L, Sanders Andrew P, Yadavalli Sai Divya, Allievi Sara, McGinigle Katharine L, Stangenberg Lars, Schermerhorn Marc

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;81(1):137-147.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.060. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.060
PMID:39237060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11637925/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify preoperative factors associated with nonhome discharge (NHD) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). NHD has implications for patient care, readmission, and long-term mortality; nevertheless, the existing literature lacks information regarding factors associated with NHD for patients undergoing EVAR. In contrast, our study assesses preoperative factors associated with NHD for this population by using national data from the Vascular Quality Initiative.

METHODS

We identified adult patients who underwent elective EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2003-2022) and excluded those who were not living at home preoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify preoperative factors associated with NHD. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox-regression analyses were used to assess the impact of NHD on 5-year survival as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

We included 61,792 patients, of which 3155 (5.1%) had NHD. NHD patients were more likely to be older (79 years [interquartile range, 73-18 years] vs 73 years [interquartile range, 67-79 years]), female (33.7% vs 18.2%; P < .001), non-White (16.0% vs 11.7%; P < .001), and have more comorbidities. NHD patients had higher rates of postoperative complications (acute kidney injury, 11.9% vs 2.0% [P < .001]; myocardial infarction, 3.8% vs 0.5% [P < .001]; and in-hospital reintervention, 4.7% vs 0.5% [P = .033]). Multivariable analysis revealed many preoperative characteristics were associated with higher odds of NHD: most notably, age (per additional decade: odds ratio [OR], 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-2.28; P < .001), female sex (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.63-1.95; P < .001) and aneurysm diameter >65 mm (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.98-2.39; P < .001), along with potentially modifiable factors, including anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, weight, and diabetes. In contrast, aspirin, statin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocekr use were associated with lower odds of NHD. NHD was associated with higher hazards of 5-year mortality, even after adjusting for confounders (40% vs 14%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.86-2.44; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors were associated with higher odds of NHD after elective EVAR, including nonmodifiable factors such as female sex and larger aortic diameter, and potentially modifiable factors such as anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, body mass index, and diabetes. Special attention should be given to populations with nonmodifiable factors, and efforts at optimizing medical conditions with higher NHD likelihood seems appropriate to improve patient outcomes and quality of life after EVAR.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后与非家庭出院(NHD)相关的术前因素。非家庭出院对患者护理、再入院和长期死亡率有影响;然而,现有文献缺乏关于接受EVAR治疗的患者非家庭出院相关因素的信息。相比之下,我们的研究通过使用来自血管质量倡议组织的全国性数据,评估了该人群中与非家庭出院相关的术前因素。

方法

我们在血管质量倡议组织(2003 - 2022年)中确定了接受择期EVAR的成年患者,并排除了术前不住在家中的患者。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与非家庭出院相关的术前因素。采用Kaplan - Meier方法和Cox回归分析来评估非家庭出院作为次要结局对5年生存率的影响。

结果

我们纳入了61792例患者,其中3155例(5.1%)有非家庭出院情况。非家庭出院的患者更可能年龄较大(79岁[四分位间距,73 - 81岁]对73岁[四分位间距,67 - 79岁])、女性(33.7%对18.2%;P <.001)、非白人(16.0%对11.7%;P <.001),且合并症更多。非家庭出院的患者术后并发症发生率更高(急性肾损伤,11.9%对2.0%[P <.001];心肌梗死,3.8%对0.5%[P <.001];院内再次干预,4.7%对0.5%[P =.033])。多变量分析显示,许多术前特征与非家庭出院的较高几率相关:最显著的是年龄(每增加十岁:比值比[OR],2.15;95%置信区间[CI],2.03 - 2.28;P <.001)、女性性别(OR,1.79;95% CI,1.63 - 1.95;P <.001)和动脉瘤直径>65 mm(OR,2.18;95% CI,1.98 - 2.39;P <.001),以及一些可能可改变的因素,包括贫血、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性心力衰竭、体重和糖尿病。相比之下,使用阿司匹林、他汀类药物和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂与非家庭出院的较低几率相关。即使在调整混杂因素后,非家庭出院也与5年死亡率的较高风险相关(40%对14%;调整后的风险比,2.13;95% CI,1.86 - 2.44;P <.001)。

结论

择期EVAR后,有几个因素与非家庭出院的较高几率相关,包括女性性别和主动脉直径较大等不可改变的因素,以及贫血、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性心力衰竭、体重指数和糖尿病等可能可改变的因素。应特别关注具有不可改变因素的人群,努力优化非家庭出院可能性较高的医疗状况似乎有助于改善EVAR后患者的结局和生活质量。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with nonhome discharge after endovascular aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术后非回家出院的相关因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;81(1):137-147.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.060. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Preoperative Predictors of Discharge Destination after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复术后出院目的地的术前预测因素
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 May;57:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.058. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
3
Defining risk and identifying predictors of mortality for open conversion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.定义血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术后开放转换的风险并确定死亡预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;63(4):873-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.058. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
4
Contemporary outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients deemed unfit for open surgical repair.血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术在被认为不适合开放手术修复的患者中的当代结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1583-1592.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.147. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Preoperative predictors of nonhome discharge after fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.复杂胸腹主动脉瘤腔内分支型覆膜支架术后非出院预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):469-477.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
6
Uncontrolled hypertension is associated with complications and poorer outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair.未控制的高血压与血管内动脉瘤修复术后的并发症及较差预后相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.030. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
7
Women Experience Higher Rates of Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.女性在胸主动脉腔内修复术后的死亡率更高。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt A):286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.08.020. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
8
Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal approach for nonruptured open conversion after endovascular aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术后非破裂性开放转换的腹膜后与经腹膜途径
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;81(1):118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
9
Anemia and postoperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms.非破裂性腹主动脉瘤开放修复和血管内修复术后贫血与结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):738-751.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.233. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
Endovascular aneurysm repair patients who are lost to follow-up have worse outcomes.失访的血管内动脉瘤修复患者预后较差。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.106. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Thoracic and Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.使用机器学习预测胸段和复杂血管腔内主动脉瘤修复后的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e039221. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039221. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodal Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Surgery: A Feasibility Study.血管腔内主动脉瘤修复手术患者的多模式术前康复:一项可行性研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Dec 30:15266028231219674. doi: 10.1177/15266028231219674.
2
Predictors of non-home discharge after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients aged 80 years and above.80岁及以上患者胰十二指肠切除术后非回家出院的预测因素。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Mar;26(3):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Status of diagnosis and therapy of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤的诊断与治疗现状
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 28;10:1199804. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199804. eCollection 2023.
4
Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for the Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms of 5.0-5.5 cm: Differences between Men and Women.选择性血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)治疗直径5.0 - 5.5厘米的肾下腹主动脉瘤:男性与女性的差异
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):4364. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134364.
5
Effect of Body Mass Index on Early Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.体重指数对血管内腹主动脉瘤修复早期结果的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;93:109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.054. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
6
Improved postoperative blood glucose control through implementation of clinical pharmacist driven glycemic management model after colorectal surgery.通过在结直肠手术后实施临床药师主导的血糖管理模式,改善术后血糖控制。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jun;225(6):1050-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.12.018. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
7
Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Nonhome Discharge in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: An Observational Study.急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者非家庭出院的风险因素和临床结局:一项观察性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e020292. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020292. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
8
Association between intravenous iron therapy and short-term mortality risk in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: an observational study.静脉铁治疗与老年髋部骨折手术患者短期死亡风险的关系:一项观察性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 18;16(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02462-x.
9
Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Diseases: An Interim Report From the NKF-ASN Task Force.重新评估种族在诊断肾脏疾病中的纳入问题:NKF-ASN 工作组的中期报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jul;78(1):103-115. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Risk scoring model for prediction of non-home discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后非家庭出院预测的风险评分模型
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020 Oct 28;17(10):621-627. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.10.002.