• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国烹饪学习的观点及公众对烹饪教育政策的支持:一项混合方法研究。

Perspectives on learning to cook and public support for cooking education policies in the United States: A mixed methods study.

作者信息

Wolfson Julia A, Frattaroli Shannon, Bleich Sara N, Smith Katherine Clegg, Teret Stephen P

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

出版信息

Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.004
PMID:27720707
Abstract

Declines in cooking skills in the United States may contribute to poor diet quality and high obesity rates. Little is known about how Americans learn to cook or their support for cooking education policies. The objective of this study was to examine how Americans learn to cook, attributions of responsibility for teaching children how to cook, and public support for policies to teach cooking skills. We used a concurrent, triangulation mixed-methods design that combined qualitative focus group data (from 7 focus groups in Baltimore, MD (N = 53)) with quantitative survey data from a nationally representative, web-based survey (N = 1112). We analyzed focus group data (using grounded theory) and survey data (using multivariable logistic regression). We find that relatively few Americans learn to cook from formal instruction in school or community cooking classes; rather, they primarily learn from their parents and/or by teaching themselves using cookbooks, recipe websites or by watching cooking shows on television. While almost all Americans hold parents and other family members responsible for teaching children how to cook, a broad majority of the public supports requiring cooking skills to be taught in schools either through existing health education (64%) or through dedicated home economics courses (67%). Slightly less than half of all Americans (45%) support increasing funding for cooking instruction for participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Broad public support for teaching cooking skills in schools suggests that schools are one promising avenue for policy action. However, school-based strategies should be complemented with alternatives that facilitate self-learning. More research is needed to identify effective means of teaching and disseminating the key cooking skills and knowledge that support healthy eating.

摘要

美国烹饪技能的下降可能导致饮食质量不佳和肥胖率居高不下。对于美国人如何学习烹饪或他们对烹饪教育政策的支持情况,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查美国人如何学习烹饪、对教孩子烹饪的责任归属以及公众对烹饪技能教学政策的支持情况。我们采用了一种同步的、三角测量混合方法设计,将定性焦点小组数据(来自马里兰州巴尔的摩的7个焦点小组(N = 53))与来自全国代表性的网络调查的定量调查数据(N = 1112)相结合。我们分析了焦点小组数据(使用扎根理论)和调查数据(使用多变量逻辑回归)。我们发现,相对较少的美国人是通过学校的正规教学或社区烹饪课程学习烹饪的;相反,他们主要是从父母那里学习和/或通过使用食谱、食谱网站自学,或者通过观看电视烹饪节目来学习。虽然几乎所有美国人都认为父母和其他家庭成员有责任教孩子如何烹饪,但绝大多数公众支持通过现有的健康教育(64%)或专门的家政课程(67%)在学校教授烹饪技能。略少于一半的美国人(45%)支持增加对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者烹饪教学的资金投入。公众对学校烹饪技能教学的广泛支持表明,学校是政策行动的一个有前景的途径。然而,基于学校的策略应该辅以促进自学的替代方法。需要更多的研究来确定教授和传播支持健康饮食的关键烹饪技能和知识的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Perspectives on learning to cook and public support for cooking education policies in the United States: A mixed methods study.美国烹饪学习的观点及公众对烹饪教育政策的支持:一项混合方法研究。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
2
What is the status of food literacy in Australian high schools? Perceptions of home economics teachers.澳大利亚高中学生的食品素养状况如何?家政教师的看法。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:326-334. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
Identifying users of traditional and Internet-based resources for meal ideas: An association rule learning approach.识别传统资源和基于互联网的饮食创意资源的用户:一种关联规则学习方法。
Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Self-reported food skills of university students.大学生自我报告的食物技能。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
Food-related behavior and intake of adult main meal preparers of 9-10 year-old children participating in iCook 4-H: A five-state childhood obesity prevention pilot study.9-10 岁儿童参与 iCook4-H:五项州立儿童肥胖预防试点研究中儿童主餐准备者的食物相关行为和摄入量。
Appetite. 2016 Jun 1;101:163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Who is teaching the kids to cook? Results from a nationally representative survey of secondary school students in New Zealand.谁在教孩子们做饭?来自新西兰全国代表性中学生调查的结果。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016 Aug 10;30(3):/j/ijamh.2018.30.issue-3/ijamh-2016-0064/ijamh-2016-0064.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2016-0064.
7
Food skills confidence and household gatekeepers' dietary practices.食品技能信心与家庭主导者的饮食习惯。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Nutrition and food skills education for adults with developmental disabilities.为发育障碍成年人提供营养与食品技能教育。
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011 Spring;72(1):7-13. doi: 10.3148/72.1.2011.7.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Nutrition and Culinary in the Kitchen Program: a randomized controlled intervention to promote cooking skills and healthy eating in university students - study protocol.营养与烹饪课程计划:一项促进大学生烹饪技能和健康饮食的随机对照干预研究——研究方案。
Nutr J. 2017 Dec 20;16(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0305-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Cooking Skills and Associated Variables in Public University Students from Northeast Brazil.巴西东北部公立大学学生的烹饪技能及相关变量
Nutrients. 2025 May 8;17(10):1606. doi: 10.3390/nu17101606.
2
Tacit Knowledge in Cooking: A Key to Teaching and Integrating Cooking as a Practice.烹饪中的隐性知识:将烹饪作为一种实践进行教学与整合的关键。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025 Aug;57(8):787-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2025.03.010. Epub 2025 May 27.
3
A virtual culinary medicine intervention for ethnically diverse individuals with type 2 diabetes: development of the Nourishing the Community through Culinary Medicine.
一项针对不同种族2型糖尿病患者的虚拟烹饪医学干预措施:通过烹饪医学滋养社区项目的开发。
Front Nutr. 2024 Aug 16;11:1383621. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1383621. eCollection 2024.
4
Mediterranean Diet Information on TikTok and Implications for Digital Health Promotion Research: Social Media Content Analysis.TikTok上的地中海饮食信息及其对数字健康促进研究的启示:社交媒体内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 19;8:e51094. doi: 10.2196/51094.
5
Nutrition and Food Literacy: Framing the Challenges to Health Communication.营养与食品素养:健康传播面临的挑战。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 7;15(22):4708. doi: 10.3390/nu15224708.
6
Patterns of home cooking practices among participants in a behavioral weight loss program: A latent class analysis.一项行为减肥项目参与者的家庭烹饪习惯模式:潜在类别分析
Appetite. 2023 May 1;184:106504. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106504. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Analysis of Recipes Shared as 'Healthy' in a Popular Brazilian Website: A Cross-Sectional Study.巴西热门网站“健康食谱”分析:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113914.
8
Influences of psychosocial factors and home food availability on healthy meal preparation.社会心理因素和家庭食物供应对健康膳食准备的影响。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Dec;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e13054. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13054.
9
Development and implementation of a community health centre-based cooking skills intervention in Detroit, MI.密歇根州底特律市社区健康中心烹饪技能干预项目的制定与实施。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Feb;24(3):549-560. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003481. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
10
Cook-Ed: A Model for Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Cooking Programs to Improve Diet and Health.库克 - 埃德:一个用于规划、实施和评估烹饪项目以改善饮食与健康的模型。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 6;12(7):2011. doi: 10.3390/nu12072011.