Suppr超能文献

竞争结果对人类睾酮浓度的影响:一项更新的荟萃分析。

Effects of competition outcome on testosterone concentrations in humans: An updated meta-analysis.

作者信息

Geniole Shawn N, Bird Brian M, Ruddick Erika L, Carré Justin M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada; Neuropsychopharmacology and Biopsychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Psychology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Horm Behav. 2017 Jun;92:37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

Abstract

A contribution to a special issue on Hormones and Human Competition. Since Archer's (2006) influential meta-analysis, there has been a major increase in the number of studies investigating the effect of competition outcome on testosterone reactivity patterns in humans. Despite this increased research output, there remains debate as to whether competition outcome modulates testosterone concentrations. The present paper examines this question using a meta-analytic approach including papers published over the last 35years. Moreover, it provides the first meta-analytic estimate of the effect of competition outcome on testosterone concentrations in women. Results from a meta-analysis involving 60 effect sizes and >2500 participants indicated that winners of a competition demonstrated a larger increase in testosterone concentrations relative to losers (D=0.20)-an effect that was highly heterogeneous. This 'winner-loser' effect was most robust in studies conducted outside the lab (e.g., in sport venues) (D=0.43); for studies conducted in the lab, the effect of competition outcome on testosterone reactivity patterns was relatively weak (D=0.08), and only found in studies of men (D=0.15; in women: D=-0.04). Further, the 'winner-loser' effect was stronger among studies in which pre-competition testosterone was sampled earlier than (D=0.38, after trim and fill correction) rather than within (D=0.09) 10min of the start of the competition. Therefore, these results also provide important insight regarding study design and methodology, and will be a valuable resource for researchers conducting subsequent studies on the 'winner loser' effect.

摘要

对《激素与人类竞争》特刊的一篇投稿。自阿彻(2006年)具有影响力的元分析以来,研究竞争结果对人类睾酮反应模式影响的研究数量大幅增加。尽管研究成果有所增加,但关于竞争结果是否会调节睾酮浓度仍存在争议。本文采用元分析方法,纳入过去35年发表的论文来探讨这个问题。此外,它还首次对竞争结果对女性睾酮浓度的影响进行了元分析估计。一项涉及60个效应量和超过2500名参与者的元分析结果表明,比赛获胜者相对于失败者,睾酮浓度的增加幅度更大(D = 0.20)——这一效应具有高度异质性。这种“赢家 - 输家”效应在实验室之外进行的研究中最为显著(例如在体育场馆)(D = 0.43);对于在实验室进行的研究,竞争结果对睾酮反应模式的影响相对较弱(D = 0.08),且仅在男性研究中发现(D = 0.15;在女性中:D = -0.04)。此外,在比赛开始前10分钟内较早(修剪和填充校正后D = 0.38)而非在此期间(D = 0.09)采集赛前睾酮样本的研究中,“赢家 - 输家”效应更强。因此,这些结果也为研究设计和方法提供了重要见解,对于后续开展“赢家 - 输家”效应研究的研究人员而言将是一份宝贵的资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验