• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在某些直肠病变中,黏膜下剥离术相较于全层经肛门内镜显微手术具有优势。

Submucosal dissection has advantages over full-thickness transanal endoscopic microsurgery in selected rectal lesions.

作者信息

Yap Kiryu, Mills Sarah, Thomas Michelle, Moore James

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Department of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):903-907. doi: 10.1111/ans.13791. Epub 2016 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/ans.13791
PMID:27723243
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To establish the incidence of unsuspected malignancy in lesions excised through transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and examine the justification for full-thickness excision of all lesions thought to be benign pre-operatively.

METHODS

Demographic, operative and pathology data of all patients undergoing TEM at a single institution were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Follow-up data were collected with a focus on polyp recurrence rates and outcome in patients found to harbour malignancy. For lesions thought to be benign pre-operatively, a submucosal excision was routinely performed.

RESULTS

TEM was attempted in 156 cases between June 1999 and April 2013. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 66.8 (2.1) years, with 111 males. Mean tumour size was 4.1 (1.6) cm, and mean height from anal verge was 10.4 (2.1) cm. In nine cases, the procedure was unable to be completed and in eight cases a deliberate full-thickness excision was performed. In 139 patients with a presumed benign lesion, mean operating time was 53.4 min. A total of 17 (12.2%) were found to harbour an unsuspected malignancy. Recurrent polyp was seen in 14 (11.7%) of 122 cases of benign pathology (mean follow-up 24.5 months) and was managed by endoscopic means in 10 patients. Mean length of stay was 1.2 days and complications occurred in 7% of cases. No patient with an unsuspected malignancy has developed recurrent disease (mean follow-up 43 months).

CONCLUSION

Submucosal TEM can result in low complication rates, short duration of surgery, short hospital stay and satisfactory recurrence rates when performed for presumed benign rectal tumours.

摘要

背景

确定经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)切除病变中未被怀疑的恶性肿瘤的发生率,并探讨对所有术前被认为是良性的病变进行全层切除的合理性。

方法

将在单一机构接受TEM治疗的所有患者的人口统计学、手术和病理数据收集到一个前瞻性维护的数据库中。收集随访数据,重点关注息肉复发率和发现患有恶性肿瘤患者的结局。对于术前被认为是良性的病变,常规进行黏膜下切除。

结果

1999年6月至2013年4月期间共尝试进行了156例TEM手术。患者平均(标准差)年龄为66.8(2.1)岁,其中男性111例。肿瘤平均大小为4.1(1.6)cm,距肛缘平均高度为10.4(2.1)cm。9例手术未能完成,8例进行了有意的全层切除。139例被认为是良性病变的患者,平均手术时间为53.4分钟。共发现17例(12.2%)存在未被怀疑的恶性肿瘤。122例良性病理患者中有14例(11.7%)出现息肉复发(平均随访24.5个月),其中10例通过内镜手段进行了处理。平均住院时间为1.2天,7%的病例发生了并发症。未发现有未被怀疑的恶性肿瘤的患者出现复发病例(平均随访43个月)。

结论

对于假定为良性的直肠肿瘤,黏膜下TEM手术可导致低并发症发生率、短手术时间、短住院时间和令人满意的复发率。

相似文献

1
Submucosal dissection has advantages over full-thickness transanal endoscopic microsurgery in selected rectal lesions.在某些直肠病变中,黏膜下剥离术相较于全层经肛门内镜显微手术具有优势。
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Nov;87(11):903-907. doi: 10.1111/ans.13791. Epub 2016 Oct 9.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for treatment of rectal tumors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)治疗直肠肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1688-1695. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06945-1. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Quality of Local Excision for Rectal Neoplasms Using Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Multi-institutional Matched Analysis.经肛门内镜显微手术与经肛门微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤的局部切除质量:多机构匹配分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):928-935. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000884.
4
Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal tumor.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与经肛门内镜显微手术治疗直肠肿瘤的疗效及安全性比较
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar-Apr;24(2):115-121. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_440_17.
5
Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD): A novel approach to the local treatment of early rectal cancer.经肛门内镜微创手术下黏膜剥离术(TEM-ESD):一种治疗早期直肠癌的新方法。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;39:101662. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101662. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术和经肛门内镜显微手术治疗直肠肿瘤的长期疗效。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1634-1641. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15309. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
[Application of KeyPort access to transanal endoscopic mircrosurgery].[KeyPort接入在经肛门内镜显微手术中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1131-1136. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.007.
8
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients.经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)用于良性肿瘤和早期直肠癌的局部切除:50 例患者的疗效和结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):301-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827ca313.
9
Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.经肛门内镜下切除并进入腹腔:需谨慎对待。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1816-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4452-y. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients with Rare Rectal Tumors.经肛门内镜显微手术治疗罕见直肠肿瘤患者
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 May;28(5):546-552. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0606. Epub 2017 Dec 13.