Rodriguez Maria I, Seuc Armando, Say Lale, Hindin Michelle J
Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0242-9.
To investigate the association between type of episiotomy and obstetric outcomes among 6,187 women with type 3 Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
We conducted a secondary analysis of women presenting in labor to 28 obstetric centres in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal and Sudan between November 2001 and March 2003. Data were analysed using cross tabulations and multivariable logistic regression to determine if type of episiotomy by FGM classification had a significant impact on key maternal outcomes. Our main outcome measures were anal sphincter tears, intrapartum blood loss requiring an intervention, and postpartum haemorrhage.
Type of episiotomy performed varied significantly by FGM status. Among women without FGM, the most common type of episiotomy performed was posterior lateral (25.4 %). The prevalence of the most extensive type of episiotomy, anterior and posterior lateral episiotomy increased with type of FGM. Among women without FGM, 0.4 % had this type of episiotomy. This increased to 0.6 % for women with FGM Types 1, 2 or 4 and to 54.6 % of all women delivering vaginally with FGM Type 3. After adjustment, women with an anterior episiotomy, (AOR = 0.15 95 %; CI 0.06-0.40); posterior lateral episiotomy (AOR = 0.68 95 %; CI 0.50-0.94) or both anterior and posterior lateral episiotomies performed concurrently (AOR = 0.21 95 % CI 0.12-0.36) were all significantly less likely to have anal sphincter tears compared to women without episiotomies. Women with anterior episiotomy (AOR = 0.08; 95%CI 0.02-0.24), posterior lateral episiotomy (AOR = 0.17 95 %; CI 0.05-0.52) and the combination of the two (AOR = 0.04 95 % CI 0.01-0.11) were significantly less likely to have postpartum haemorrhage compared with women who had no episiotomy.
Among women living with FGM Type 3, episiotomies were protective against anal sphincter tears and postpartum haemorrhage. Further clinical and research is needed to guide clinical practice of when episiotomies should be performed.
调查6187例接受3型女性生殖器切割(FGM)的女性中,会阴切开术类型与产科结局之间的关联。
对2001年11月至2003年3月期间在布基纳法索、加纳、肯尼亚、尼日利亚、塞内加尔和苏丹的28个产科中心分娩的女性进行二次分析。使用交叉表和多变量逻辑回归分析数据,以确定按FGM分类的会阴切开术类型是否对关键的孕产妇结局有显著影响。我们的主要结局指标是肛门括约肌撕裂、需要干预的产时失血和产后出血。
会阴切开术的类型因FGM状态而异。在未接受FGM的女性中,最常见的会阴切开术类型是后外侧切开术(25.4%)。会阴切开术最广泛的类型,即前后侧会阴切开术的患病率随FGM类型的增加而增加。在未接受FGM的女性中,0.4%的人接受了这种类型的会阴切开术。对于1型、2型或4型FGM的女性,这一比例增至0.6%,而在所有接受3型FGM阴道分娩的女性中,这一比例为54.6%。调整后,与未行会阴切开术的女性相比,行前会阴切开术(比值比[AOR]=0.15,95%置信区间[CI]:0.06 - 0.40)、后外侧会阴切开术(AOR = 0.68,95%CI:0.50 - 0.94)或同时行前后侧会阴切开术(AOR = 0.21,95%CI:0.12 - 0.36)的女性发生肛门括约肌撕裂显著减少。行前会阴切开术(AOR = 0.08;95%CI:0.02 - 0.24)、后外侧会阴切开术(AOR = 0.17,95%CI:0.05 - 0.52)以及两者联合(AOR = 0.04,95%CI:0.01 - 0.11)的女性与未行会阴切开术的女性相比,发生产后出血的可能性显著降低。
在接受3型FGM的女性中,会阴切开术对预防肛门括约肌撕裂和产后出血有保护作用。需要进一步的临床和研究来指导何时应进行会阴切开术的临床实践。