• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

样本量计算:基本原理。

Sample size calculation: Basic principles.

作者信息

Das Sabyasachi, Mitra Koel, Mandal Mohanchandra

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, North Bengal Medical College, Sushrutanagar, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;60(9):652-656. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.190621.

DOI:10.4103/0019-5049.190621
PMID:27729692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5037946/
Abstract

Addressing a sample size is a practical issue that has to be solved during planning and designing stage of the study. The aim of any clinical research is to detect the actual difference between two groups (power) and to provide an estimate of the difference with a reasonable accuracy (precision). Hence, researchers should do estimate of sample size well ahead, before conducting the study. sample size computation is not encouraged conventionally. Adequate sample size minimizes the random error or in other words, lessens something happening by chance. Too small a sample may fail to answer the research question and can be of questionable validity or provide an imprecise answer while too large a sample may answer the question but is resource-intensive and also may be unethical. More transparency in the calculation of sample size is required so that it can be justified and replicated while reporting.

摘要

确定样本量是研究规划和设计阶段必须解决的一个实际问题。任何临床研究的目的都是检测两组之间的实际差异(效能),并以合理的准确度(精度)对差异进行估计。因此,研究人员应在开展研究之前尽早对样本量进行估计。传统上不鼓励进行样本量计算。足够的样本量可将随机误差降至最低,或者换句话说,减少偶然发生的事情。样本量过小可能无法回答研究问题,其有效性可能存疑,或者提供不准确的答案,而样本量过大可能能回答问题,但资源密集,也可能不符合伦理道德。在样本量计算方面需要更高的透明度,以便在报告时能够说明其合理性并可重复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f32/5037946/c07aaa547b83/IJA-60-652-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f32/5037946/c07aaa547b83/IJA-60-652-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f32/5037946/c07aaa547b83/IJA-60-652-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sample size calculation: Basic principles.样本量计算:基本原理。
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;60(9):652-656. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.190621.
2
Sample size and power analysis in medical research.医学研究中的样本量与效能分析。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2004 Mar-Apr;70(2):123-8.
3
Estimating sample size in clinical studies: basic methodological principles.临床研究中的样本量估计:基本方法学原理。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2003 Dec;22(12):1513-21.
4
Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?顾问论坛:是否应该进行事后样本量计算?
Pharm Stat. 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):163-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.334.
5
Important considerations in calculating and reporting of sample size in randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验中样本量计算与报告的重要考量因素。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Dec 25;31:127. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.127. eCollection 2017.
6
Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review.发表于主要麻醉学杂志的随机对照试验中样本量计算报告的陷阱:一项系统综述
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):699-707. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev166. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Sample size of surgical randomized controlled trials: a lack of improvement over time.外科随机对照试验的样本量:随时间推移并无改善。
J Surg Res. 2018 Aug;228:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Concepts in sample size determination.样本量确定的相关概念。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):660-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107385.
9
Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.样本量计算:基本原理和常见陷阱。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 May;25(5):1388-93. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp732. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
10
Reporting of sample size calculations in analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review.镇痛临床试验中样本量计算的报告:ACCTION系统评价
J Pain. 2015 Mar;16(3):199-206.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors impacting university students' quality of life.影响大学生生活质量的因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0329851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329851. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of Swanson theory-based auricular acupressure on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, and broader health-related outcomes in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.基于斯旺森理论的耳穴按压对化疗引起的周围神经病变及乳腺癌患者更广泛健康相关结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 May 21;12:100729. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100729. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
The Role of Statistical Power: A Study of Relationship Between Emotional and Conduct Problems, Sociodemographic Factors, and Smoking Behaviours in Large and Small Samples of Latvian Adolescents.

本文引用的文献

1
Basic concepts for sample size calculation: Critical step for any clinical trials!样本量计算的基本概念:任何临床试验的关键步骤!
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):328-31. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.174918.
2
Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review.发表于主要麻醉学杂志的随机对照试验中样本量计算报告的陷阱:一项系统综述
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):699-707. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev166. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Why perform a priori sample size calculation?
统计功效的作用:拉脱维亚青少年大样本和小样本中情绪与行为问题、社会人口学因素及吸烟行为之间关系的研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 9;61(4):687. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040687.
4
Social Determinants Influencing Internet-Based Service Adoption Among Female Family Caregivers in Bangladesh: A Sociodemographic and Technological Analysis.影响孟加拉国女性家庭照顾者采用基于互联网服务的社会决定因素:一项社会人口学和技术分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;8(4):e70665. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70665. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Power analysis for concurrent balanced or imbalanced multiple-intervention stepped wedge design: a simulation-based approach.并发平衡或不平衡多干预阶梯楔形设计的功效分析:一种基于模拟的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02546-w.
6
Prognostic Significance of S100A4 in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: Its Relation to Tumor Progression and Chemoresistance.S100A4在卵巢透明细胞癌中的预后意义:其与肿瘤进展和化疗耐药性的关系
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;17(2):184. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020184.
7
PIN1 Prolyl Isomerase Promotes Initiation and Progression of Bladder Cancer through the SREBP2-Mediated Cholesterol Biosynthesis Pathway.PIN1脯氨酰异构酶通过SREBP2介导的胆固醇生物合成途径促进膀胱癌的发生和发展。
Cancer Discov. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):633-655. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0866.
8
Basic Statistics for Radiologists: Part 1-Basic Data Interpretation and Inferential Statistics.放射科医生的基础统计学:第1部分 - 基础数据解读与推断统计学
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S58-S73. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1796644. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Mean Platelet Volume as an Emerging Biomarker for Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study.平均血小板体积作为诊断急性阑尾炎的新兴生物标志物:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 6;16(12):e75247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75247. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Seeking and receiving hypertension and diabetes mellitus care in Tanzania.在坦桑尼亚寻求和接受高血压和糖尿病的护理。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 22;19(11):e0312258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312258. eCollection 2024.
为什么要进行先验样本量计算?
Can J Surg. 2013 Jun;56(3):207-13. doi: 10.1503/cjs.018012.
4
Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review.随机临床试验原始研究方案中样本量的确定:综述。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 21;346:f1135. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1135.
5
How to calculate sample size in randomized controlled trial?如何在随机对照试验中计算样本量?
J Thorac Dis. 2009 Dec;1(1):51-4.
6
Sample size calculations.样本量计算。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(4):c319-23. doi: 10.1159/000322830. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
7
Practical tips for surgical research: Research questions, hypotheses and objectives.外科研究实用技巧:研究问题、假设与目标。
Can J Surg. 2010 Aug;53(4):278-81.
8
Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.样本量计算:基本原理和常见陷阱。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 May;25(5):1388-93. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp732. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Sample size and power analysis in medical research.医学研究中的样本量与效能分析。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2004 Mar-Apr;70(2):123-8.
10
Ethics and sample size.伦理与样本量。
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jan 15;161(2):105-10. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi014.