Rocheta Margarida, Coito João L, Ramos Miguel J N, Carvalho Luísa, Becker Jörg D, Carbonell-Bejerano Pablo, Amâncio Sara
Instituto Superior de Agronomia, LEAF, Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017, Lisboa, Portugal.
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Oct 12;16(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0911-4.
Predicted climate changes announce an increase of extreme environmental conditions including drought and excessive heat and light in classical viticultural regions. Thus, understanding how grapevine responds to these conditions and how different genotypes can adapt, is crucial for informed decisions on accurate viticultural actions. Global transcriptome analyses are useful for this purpose as the response to these abiotic stresses involves the interplay of complex and diverse cascades of physiological, cellular and molecular events. The main goal of the present work was to evaluate the response to diverse imposed abiotic stresses at the transcriptome level and to compare the response of two grapevine varieties with contrasting physiological trends, Trincadeira (TR) and Touriga Nacional (TN).
Leaf transcriptomic response upon heat, high light and drought treatments in growth room controlled conditions, as well as full irrigation and non-irrigation treatments in the field, was compared in TR and TN using GrapeGene GeneChips®. Breakdown of metabolism in response to all treatments was evidenced by the functional annotation of down-regulated genes. However, circa 30 % of the detected stress-responsive genes are still annotated as «Unknown» function. Selected differentially expressed genes from the GrapeGene GeneChip® were analysed by RT-qPCR in leaves of growth room plants under the combination of individual stresses and of field plants, in both varieties. The transcriptomic results correlated better with those obtained after each individual stress than with the results of plants from field conditions.
From the transcriptomic comparison between the two Portuguese grapevine varieties Trincadeira and Touriga Nacional under abiotic stress main conclusions can be drawn: 1. A different level of tolerance to stress is evidenced by a lower transcriptome reprogramming in TN than in TR. Interestingly, this lack of response in TN associates with its higher adaptation to extreme conditions including environmental conditions in a changing climate; 2. A complex interplay between stress transcriptional cascades is evidenced by antagonistic and, in lower frequency, synergistic effects on gene expression when several stresses are imposed together; 3. The grapevine responses to stress under controlled conditions are not fully extrapolated to the complex vineyard scenario and should be cautiously considered for agronomic management decision purposes.
预计的气候变化表明,在传统葡萄种植区,极端环境条件将增加,包括干旱、过热和强光。因此,了解葡萄对这些条件的反应以及不同基因型如何适应,对于做出准确的葡萄种植行动的明智决策至关重要。全球转录组分析对于此目的很有用,因为对这些非生物胁迫的反应涉及复杂多样的生理、细胞和分子事件级联的相互作用。本研究的主要目标是在转录组水平上评估对不同施加的非生物胁迫的反应,并比较两个生理趋势相反的葡萄品种,特林卡岱拉(TR)和国产多瑞加(TN)的反应。
使用GrapeGene GeneChips®在TR和TN中比较了在生长室控制条件下的热、高光和干旱处理以及田间的充分灌溉和非灌溉处理后的叶片转录组反应。下调基因的功能注释证明了对所有处理的代谢分解。然而,约30%检测到的胁迫响应基因仍被注释为“未知”功能。在两个品种的生长室植物叶片和田间植物中,通过RT-qPCR分析了从GrapeGene GeneChip®中选择的差异表达基因,这些植物处于单独胁迫组合和田间条件下。转录组结果与每种单独胁迫后获得的结果的相关性比与田间条件下植物的结果更好。
从两个葡萄牙葡萄品种特林卡岱拉和国产多瑞加在非生物胁迫下的转录组比较中可以得出主要结论:1. TN的转录组重编程低于TR,这证明了其对胁迫的耐受水平不同。有趣的是,TN的这种缺乏反应与其对包括气候变化中的环境条件在内的极端条件的更高适应性相关;2. 当几种胁迫同时施加时,对基因表达的拮抗作用以及较低频率的协同作用证明了胁迫转录级联之间的复杂相互作用;3. 葡萄在受控条件下对胁迫的反应不能完全外推到复杂的葡萄园情况,并且在进行农艺管理决策时应谨慎考虑。