Zeitani Jacob, Russo Marco, Pompeo Eugenio, Sergiacomi Gian Luigi, Chiariello Luigi
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Clinica Mediterranea, Policlinic of Tor Vergata University.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinic of Tor Vergata University.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;49(5):366-373. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.5.366. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that in patients with chronic complex sternum dehiscence, the use of muscle flap repair minimizes the occurrence of paradoxical motion of the chest wall (CWPM) when compared to sternal rewiring, eventually leading to better respiratory function and clinical outcomes during follow-up.
In a propensity score matching analysis, out of 94 patients who underwent sternal reconstruction, 20 patients were selected: 10 patients underwent sternal reconstruction with bilateral pectoralis muscle flaps (group 1) and 10 underwent sternal rewiring (group 2). Eligibility criteria included the presence of hemisternum diastases associated with multiple (≥3) bone fractures and radiologic evidence of synchronous chest wall motion (CWSM). We compared radiologically assessed (volumetric computed tomography) ventilatory mechanic indices such as single lung and global vital capacity (VC), diaphragm excursion, synchronous and paradoxical chest wall motion.
Follow-up was 100% complete (mean 85±24 months). CWPM was inversely correlated with single lung VC (Spearman R=-0.72, p=0.0003), global VC (R=-0.51, p=0.02) and diaphragm excursion (R=-0.80, p=0.0003), whereas it proved directly correlated with dyspnea grade (Spearman R=0.51, p=0.02) and pain (R=0.59, p=0.005). Mean CWPM and single lung VC were both better in group 1, whereas there was no difference in CWSM, diaphragm excursion and global VC.
Our study suggests that in patients with complex chronic sternal dehiscence, pectoralis muscle flap reconstruction guarantees lower CWPM and greater single-lung VC when compared with sternal rewiring and it is associated with better clinical outcomes with less pain and dyspnea.
本研究的目的是检验以下假设:对于慢性复杂性胸骨裂开患者,与胸骨重新布线相比,使用肌瓣修复可将胸壁反常运动(CWPM)的发生率降至最低,最终在随访期间带来更好的呼吸功能和临床结果。
在一项倾向评分匹配分析中,从94例行胸骨重建的患者中选取20例:10例采用双侧胸大肌瓣进行胸骨重建(第1组),10例进行胸骨重新布线(第2组)。纳入标准包括存在与多处(≥3处)骨折相关的半侧胸骨分离以及同步胸壁运动(CWSM)的影像学证据。我们比较了通过影像学评估(容积计算机断层扫描)的通气力学指标,如单肺和全肺肺活量(VC)、膈肌移动度、同步和反常胸壁运动。
随访完成率为100%(平均85±24个月)。CWPM与单肺VC(Spearman相关系数R = -0.72,p = 0.0003)、全肺VC(R = -0.51,p = 0.02)和膈肌移动度(R = -0.80,p = 0.0003)呈负相关,而与呼吸困难分级(Spearman相关系数R = 0.51,p = 0.02)和疼痛(R = 0.59,p = 0.005)呈正相关。第1组的平均CWPM和单肺VC均更佳,而CWSM、膈肌移动度和全肺VC无差异。
我们的研究表明,对于复杂性慢性胸骨裂开患者,与胸骨重新布线相比,胸大肌瓣重建可确保更低的CWPM和更大的单肺VC,并且与更好的临床结果相关,疼痛和呼吸困难更少。