• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麦品系CIho 5791和Tifang对全球柄锈菌条形柄锈菌分离株的网斑病抗性的遗传分析。

Genetic analysis of net form net blotch resistance in barley lines CIho 5791 and Tifang against a global collection of P. teres f. teres isolates.

作者信息

Koladia V M, Faris J D, Richards J K, Brueggeman R S, Chao S, Friesen T L

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

Cereal Crops Research Unit, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jan;130(1):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2801-4. Epub 2016 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00122-016-2801-4
PMID:27734097
Abstract

A CIho 5791 × Tifang recombinant inbred mapping population was developed and used to identify major dominant resistance genes on barley chromosomes 6H and 3H in CI5791 and on 3H in Tifang. The barley line CIho 5791 confers high levels of resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres, causal agent of net form net blotch (NFNB), with few documented isolates overcoming this resistance. Tifang barley also harbors resistance to P. teres f. teres which was previously shown to localize to barley chromosome 3H. A CIho 5791 × Tifang F recombinant inbred line (RIL) population was developed using single seed descent. The Illumina iSelect SNP platform was used to identify 2562 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers across the barley genome, resulting in seven linkage maps, one for each barley chromosome. The CIho 5791 × Tifang RIL population was evaluated for NFNB resistance using nine P. teres f. teres isolates collected globally. Tifang was resistant to four of the isolates tested whereas CIho 5791 was highly resistant to all nine isolates. QTL analysis indicated that the CIho 5791 resistance mapped to chromosome 6H whereas the Tifang resistance mapped to chromosome 3H. Additionally, CIho 5791 also harbored resistance to two Japanese isolates that mapped to a 3H region similar to that of Tifang. SNP markers and RILs harboring both 3H and 6H resistance will be useful in resistance breeding against NFNB.

摘要

构建了一个CIho 5791×提方重组自交系定位群体,并用于鉴定CI5791大麦6H和3H染色体以及提方3H染色体上的主要显性抗性基因。大麦品系CIho 5791对网斑病病原菌网形网斑病菌(NFNB)具有高水平抗性,几乎没有文献记载有分离株能克服这种抗性。提方大麦也对网形网斑病菌具有抗性,此前已证明该抗性定位于大麦3H染色体。利用单粒传法构建了CIho 5791×提方F重组自交系(RIL)群体。使用Illumina iSelect SNP平台在大麦全基因组中鉴定了2562个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记,从而得到七张连锁图谱,每个大麦染色体一张。利用全球收集的9个网形网斑病菌分离株对CIho 5791×提方RIL群体进行了NFNB抗性评估。提方对4个测试分离株具有抗性,而CIho 5791对所有9个分离株都具有高抗性。QTL分析表明,CIho 5791的抗性定位于染色体上,而提方的抗性定位于3H染色体。此外,CIho 5791对两个日本分离株也具有抗性,这两个分离株的抗性定位于与提方相似的3H区域。携带3H和6H抗性的SNP标记和RILs将有助于抗NFNB的抗性育种。

相似文献

1
Genetic analysis of net form net blotch resistance in barley lines CIho 5791 and Tifang against a global collection of P. teres f. teres isolates.大麦品系CIho 5791和Tifang对全球柄锈菌条形柄锈菌分离株的网斑病抗性的遗传分析。
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jan;130(1):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2801-4. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
2
A Moroccan f. Population Defeats , the Broadly Effective Resistance on Barley Chromosome 6H.摩洛哥人群战胜广泛有效的大麦 6H 染色体抗性。
Phytopathology. 2024 Jan;114(1):193-199. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-23-0117-R. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Association mapping utilizing diverse barley lines reveals net form net blotch seedling resistance/susceptibility loci.利用不同的大麦品系进行关联作图揭示了网斑病苗期抗性/感病的位点。
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 May;130(5):915-927. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2860-1. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
4
Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to net form net blotch in a collection of Nordic barley germplasm.在一组北欧大麦种质中鉴定与对网斑病抗性相关的数量性状位点。
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Oct;130(10):2025-2043. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2940-2. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
5
Identification of quantitative trait loci for net form net blotch resistance in contemporary barley breeding germplasm from the USA using genome-wide association mapping.利用全基因组关联作图鉴定美国当代大麦育种种质中对网斑病的净型抗性的数量性状位点。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Mar;133(3):1019-1037. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03528-5. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Genetic analysis of virulence in the Pyrenophora teres f. teres population BB25×FGOH04Ptt-21.在 Pyrenophora teres f. teres 群体 BB25×FGOH04Ptt-21 中进行毒力的遗传分析。
Fungal Genet Biol. 2017 Oct;107:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
7
SNPs associated with barley resistance to isolates of Pyrenophora teres f. teres.与大麦抗禾谷镰刀菌分离物相关的 SNPs。
BMC Genomics. 2019 May 8;20(Suppl 3):292. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5623-3.
8
Mapping of barley susceptibility/resistance QTL against spot form net blotch caused by Pyrenophora teres f. maculata using RIL populations.利用 RIL 群体定位大麦对叶枯病的感病/抗性 QTL。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jul;132(7):1953-1963. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03328-x. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to net form net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. teres) in a doubled haploid Norwegian barley population.在一个加倍单倍体挪威大麦群体中,与对网斑病(网形网斑病菌)抗性相关的数量性状位点定位
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0175773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175773. eCollection 2017.
10
Genetic analysis of a worldwide barley collection for resistance to net form of net blotch disease (Pyrenophora teres f. teres).对全球大麦收集品系进行抗网斑病(Pyrenophora teres f. teres)的遗传分析。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Sep;132(9):2633-2650. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03378-1. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
High resolution mapping of a novel non-transgressive hybrid susceptibility locus in barley exploited by P. teres f. maculata.高分辨率定位大麦中转座子非侵位杂种易感性新位点,该位点受 P.teres f. maculata 利用。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jun 29;24(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05303-1.
2
Virulence Spectra of Hungarian f. Isolates Collected from Experimental Fields Show Continuous Variation without Specific Isolate × Barley Differential Interactions.从试验田采集的匈牙利镰刀菌分离株的毒力谱显示出连续变化,不存在特定分离株×大麦的差异相互作用。
J Fungi (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;10(3):184. doi: 10.3390/jof10030184.
3
Multi-parental fungal mapping population study to detect genomic regions associated with Pyrenophora teres f. teres virulence.

本文引用的文献

1
Fine Mapping of the Barley Chromosome 6H Net Form Net Blotch Susceptibility Locus.大麦6H染色体网形网斑病感病基因座的精细定位
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Jul 7;6(7):1809-18. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.028902.
2
Evaluation of a Pyrenophora teres f. teres mapping population reveals multiple independent interactions with a region of barley chromosome 6H.对网斑病菌条形柄锈菌变种的一个作图群体的评估揭示了与大麦6H染色体区域的多个独立互作。
Fungal Genet Biol. 2014 Sep;70:104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
3
Necrotrophic effector-triggered susceptibility (NETS) underlies the barley-Pyrenophora teres f. teres interaction specific to chromosome 6H.
多亲本品系真菌作图群体研究,以检测与禾谷镰刀菌禾谷专化型毒性相关的基因组区域。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 16;13(1):9804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36963-y.
4
Genome-wide association mapping of Pyrenophora teres f. maculata and Pyrenophora teres f. teres resistance loci utilizing natural Turkish wild and landrace barley populations.利用土耳其野生和地方大麦群体进行叶枯病菌和禾谷镰刀菌叶斑病抗性基因的全基因组关联分析
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Oct 19;11(11). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab269.
5
Genetic mapping of host resistance to the Pyrenophora teres f. maculata isolate 13IM8.3.抗 13IM8.3 小种叶斑病菌的寄主遗传图谱绘制。
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Dec 8;11(12). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab341.
6
Fire Blight Susceptibility in spp. Correlates to Sensitivity to Secreted Cell Death Inducing Compounds.某物种对火疫病的易感性与对分泌的诱导细胞死亡化合物的敏感性相关。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 28;12:660337. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.660337. eCollection 2021.
7
The Barley Transcription Factor Is Required for Resistance Against f. .大麦转录因子是抗……所必需的 。 (你提供的原文中“f.”后面内容不完整,所以译文这里也只能翻译到这样了。)
Front Genet. 2021 Jan 15;11:601500. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.601500. eCollection 2020.
8
SNPs associated with barley resistance to isolates of Pyrenophora teres f. teres.与大麦抗禾谷镰刀菌分离物相关的 SNPs。
BMC Genomics. 2019 May 8;20(Suppl 3):292. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5623-3.
9
Identification of quantitative trait loci for net form net blotch resistance in contemporary barley breeding germplasm from the USA using genome-wide association mapping.利用全基因组关联作图鉴定美国当代大麦育种种质中对网斑病的净型抗性的数量性状位点。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Mar;133(3):1019-1037. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03528-5. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
10
Identification of a major dominant gene for race-nonspecific tan spot resistance in wild emmer wheat.鉴定出野生二粒小麦中一个对种间斑点病具有显性抗性的主效基因。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Mar;133(3):829-841. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03509-8. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
坏死营养型效应子触发的感病性(NETS)是大麦与6H染色体特异的大麦网斑病菌相互作用的基础。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2015 Feb;16(2):188-200. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12172. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
4
Anchoring and ordering NGS contig assemblies by population sequencing (POPSEQ).通过群体测序(POPSEQ)对 NGS 拼接体进行锚定和定序。
Plant J. 2013 Nov;76(4):718-27. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12319. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
5
Natural variation in a homolog of Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley.同源异型基因 Antirrhinum CENTRORADIALIS 的自然变异促进了栽培大麦的春季生长习性和环境适应性。
Nat Genet. 2012 Dec;44(12):1388-92. doi: 10.1038/ng.2447. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
6
Tricking the guard: exploiting plant defense for disease susceptibility.欺骗守卫:利用植物防御机制来提高疾病易感性。
Science. 2012 Nov 2;338(6107):659-62. doi: 10.1126/science.1226743. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
7
The cysteine rich necrotrophic effector SnTox1 produced by Stagonospora nodorum triggers susceptibility of wheat lines harboring Snn1.由禾旋孢腔菌(Stagonospora nodorum)产生的富含半胱氨酸的坏死型效应因子 SnTox1 触发了携带 Snn1 的小麦品系的易感性。
PLoS Pathog. 2012 Jan;8(1):e1002467. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002467. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
8
Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen.禾谷丝核菌:一种危害性日益增加的大麦病原菌。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2011 Jan;12(1):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00649.x.
9
Host-selective toxins, Ptr ToxA and Ptr ToxB, as necrotrophic effectors in the Pyrenophora tritici-repentis-wheat interaction.寄主选择性毒素 Ptr ToxA 和 Ptr ToxB 作为禾谷丝核菌-小麦互作中的坏死型效应因子。
New Phytol. 2010 Sep;187(4):911-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03362.x. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
10
QGene 4.0, an extensible Java QTL-analysis platform.QGene 4.0,一个可扩展的Java数量性状基因座分析平台。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 1;24(23):2788-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn523. Epub 2008 Oct 21.