van Tilburg C W J, Stronks D L, Groeneweg J G, Huygen F J P M
Department of Anesthesiology, Multidisciplinary pain center, Bravis hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands.
Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Pain. 2017 Mar;21(3):520-529. doi: 10.1002/ejp.945. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Investigate the effect of percutaneous radiofrequency compared to a sham procedure, applied to the ramus communicans for treatment of lumbar disc pain.
Randomized sham-controlled, double-blind, crossover, multicenter clinical trial. Multidisciplinary pain centres of two general hospitals. Sixty patients aged 18 or more with medical history and physical examination suggestive for lumbar disc pain and a reduction of two or more on a numerical rating scale (0-10) after a diagnostic ramus communicans test block. Treatment group: percutaneous radiofrequency treatment applied to the ramus communicans; sham: same procedure except radiofrequency treatment.
pain reduction. Secondary outcome measure: Global Perceived Effect.
No statistically significant difference in pain level over time between the groups, as well as in the group was found; however, the factor period yielded a statistically significant result. In the crossover group, 11 out of 16 patients experienced a reduction in NRS of 2 or more at 1 month (no significant deviation from chance). No statistically significant difference in satisfaction over time between the groups was found. The independent factors group and period also showed no statistically significant effects. The same applies to recovery: no statistically significant effects were found.
The null hypothesis of no difference in pain reduction and in Global Perceived Effect between the treatment and sham group cannot be rejected. Post hoc analysis revealed that none of the investigated parameters contributed to the prediction of a significant pain reduction.
Interrupting signalling through the ramus communicans may interfere with the transition of painful information from the discs to the central nervous system. Methodological differences exist in studies evaluating the efficacy of radiofrequency treatment for lumbar disc pain. A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial on the effect of radiofrequency at the ramus communicans for lumbar disc pain was conducted. The null hypothesis of no difference in pain reduction and in Global Perceived Effect between the treatment and sham group cannot be rejected.
研究经皮射频与假手术相比,应用于交通支治疗腰椎间盘疼痛的效果。
随机假手术对照、双盲、交叉、多中心临床试验。两家综合医院的多学科疼痛中心。60例年龄18岁及以上、有病史且体格检查提示腰椎间盘疼痛、在诊断性交通支试验阻滞后数字评分量表(0 - 10)降低2分或更多分的患者。治疗组:对交通支进行经皮射频治疗;假手术组:除不进行射频治疗外,操作相同。
疼痛减轻情况。次要观察指标:总体感知效果。
两组之间以及组内随时间的疼痛水平均未发现有统计学意义的差异;然而,时期因素产生了统计学意义的结果。在交叉组中,16例患者中有11例在1个月时数字评分量表降低2分或更多(与预期无显著偏差)。未发现两组之间随时间的满意度有统计学意义的差异。独立因素组和时期也未显示出统计学意义的影响。恢复情况也是如此:未发现有统计学意义的影响。
治疗组和假手术组在疼痛减轻和总体感知效果方面无差异的原假设不能被拒绝。事后分析显示,所研究的参数均无助于预测显著的疼痛减轻。
中断通过交通支的信号传导可能会干扰疼痛信息从椎间盘向中枢神经系统的传递。在评估射频治疗腰椎间盘疼痛疗效的研究中存在方法学差异。进行了一项关于射频作用于交通支治疗腰椎间盘疼痛的随机、假手术对照、双盲、多中心临床试验。治疗组和假手术组在疼痛减轻和总体感知效果方面无差异的原假设不能被拒绝。