Suppr超能文献

射频神经消融术治疗慢性腰痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Public Health Directorate, Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridge, UK

Public Health Directorate, Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 21;10(7):e035540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035540.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RD) of lumbosacral anatomical targets for the management of chronic back pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A database search (Medline, Medline in Process, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane library) was conducted from January 2014 to April 2019 for placebo or no-treatment controlled trials of RD for the management of chronic back pain. Included trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the quality of outcomes assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate mean difference (MD) in post-treatment Pain Score.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs were included in the review. There appears to be short-term pain relief (1-3 months) provided by RD of the sacroiliac joint (five trials, MD -1.53, CI -2.62 to 0.45) and intervertebral discs (four trials, MD -0.98, CI -1.84 to 0.12), but the placebo effect is large and additional intervention effect size is small (<1 on an 11 point (0-10) Pain Scale). Longer-term effectiveness (>6 months) is uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

RD of selected lumbosacral targets appears to have a small, short-term, positive effect for the management of patients with chronic back pain. However, the quality of evidence for the majority of outcomes is low or very low quality and there is still a degree of uncertainty, particularly around the duration of effect.

摘要

目的

评估射频神经阻断(RD)腰骶解剖靶点治疗慢性腰痛的效果。

设计

随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

从 2014 年 1 月到 2019 年 4 月,对用于治疗慢性腰痛的 RD 的安慰剂或无治疗对照试验进行了数据库检索(Medline、Medline 正在处理、Embase、CINHAL 和 Cochrane 图书馆)。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入试验的质量,并使用推荐评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)方法评估结局质量。进行荟萃分析以计算治疗后疼痛评分的均数差值(MD)。

结果

综述纳入了 19 项 RCT。RD 治疗骶髂关节(5 项试验,MD-1.53,CI-2.62 至 0.45)和椎间盘(4 项试验,MD-0.98,CI-1.84 至 0.12)似乎可在短期内缓解疼痛(1-3 个月),但安慰剂效应较大,额外干预的效果较小(疼痛评分 0-10 分,<1)。长期疗效(>6 个月)尚不确定。

结论

针对选定的腰骶部位靶点进行 RD 治疗似乎对慢性腰痛患者具有短期、小幅度的积极效果。然而,大多数结局的证据质量为低或极低质量,仍存在一定程度的不确定性,尤其是在疗效持续时间方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce16/7375436/14157051157d/bmjopen-2019-035540f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验