Allen Mark S, Walter Emma E, McDermott Máirtín S
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences.
Centre for Health and Social Research, Australian Catholic University.
Health Psychol. 2017 Mar;36(3):255-263. doi: 10.1037/hea0000429. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Too much sitting is associated with an increased risk of chronic disease and premature death. This investigation aimed to systematically review the evidence for personality as a correlate of time spent in sedentary pursuits.
Electronic databases (PubMed; Science Direct; PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and SPORTDiscus via EBSCO; Web of Science; MEDLINE via Ovid; Scopus; ProQuest) were searched in December 2015 for studies reporting an association between at least 1 personality trait and time spent in at least 1 sedentary behavior. Pooled mean effect sizes were computed using inverse-variance weighted random effects meta-analysis.
Twenty-six studies (28 samples, 110 effect sizes) met inclusion criteria. Higher levels of sedentary behavior were associated with higher levels of neuroticism (r+ = .08, 95% confidence interval [CI: .05, .10]) and lower levels of conscientiousness (r+ = -.08, 95% CI [-.11, -.06]). Nonsignificant associations were observed for extraversion (r+ = .00, 95% CI [-.07, .06]), openness (r+ = -.02, 95% CI [-.05, .02]), and agreeableness (r+ = -.04, 95% CI [-.09, .00]). Effects for neuroticism and extraversion were moderated by measurement of sedentary behavior, and effects for openness and agreeableness were moderated by participant age and gender.
Findings appear consistent with personality trait associations with other health-related behaviors. More objective measures of sedentary behavior are required to make more definitive conclusions about the contribution of personality to a sedentary lifestyle. (PsycINFO Database Record
久坐与慢性病风险增加和过早死亡相关。本研究旨在系统回顾关于人格与久坐行为时间相关性的证据。
于2015年12月检索电子数据库（PubMed；科学Direct；通过EBSCO检索的PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES和SPORTDiscus；科学网；通过Ovid检索的MEDLINE；Scopus；ProQuest），查找报告至少1种人格特质与至少1种久坐行为时间之间关联的研究。使用逆方差加权随机效应荟萃分析计算合并平均效应量。
26项研究（28个样本，110个效应量）符合纳入标准。久坐行为水平较高与神经质水平较高相关（r+ = 0.08，95%置信区间[CI：0.05，0.10]），与尽责性水平较低相关（r+ = -0.08，95% CI [-0.11，-0.06]）。外向性（r+ = 0.00，95% CI [-0.07，0.06]）、开放性（r+ = -0.02，95% CI [-0.05，0.02]）和宜人性（r+ = -0.04，95% CI [-0.09，0.00]）的关联不显著。神经质和外向性的效应因久坐行为测量方式而异，开放性和宜人性的效应因参与者年龄和性别而异。
研究结果似乎与人格特质与其他健康相关行为的关联一致。需要更客观的久坐行为测量方法，以便就人格对久坐生活方式的影响得出更明确的结论。（PsycINFO数据库记录）
