Bouwmans Mara E J, Bos Elisabeth H, Hoenders H J Rogier, Oldehinkel Albertine J, de Jonge Peter
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 1;207:260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.046. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
The exact nature of the complex relationship between sleep and affect has remained unclear. This study investigated the temporal order of change in sleep and affect in participants with and without depression.
27 depressed patients and 27 pair-matched healthy controls assessed their sleep in the morning and their affect 3 times a day for 30 consecutive days in their natural environment. Daily sleep quality and average positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) were used to examine whether changes in sleep quality preceded or followed changes in PA and NA, and whether this was different for patients and healthy controls. Second, presumptive mediating factors were investigated. We hypothesized that fatigue mediated the effect of changes in sleep quality on subsequent PA/NA, and that rumination mediated the effect of changes in PA/NA on subsequent sleep quality.
Multilevel models showed that changes in sleep quality predicted changes in PA (B=0.08, p<0.001) and NA (B=-0.06, p<0.001), but not the other way around (PA: B=0.03, p=0.70, NA: B=-0.05, p=0.60). Fatigue was found to be a significant mediator of the relationship between sleep quality and PA (Indirect Effect=0.03, p<0.001), and between sleep quality and NA (Indirect Effect=-0.02, p=0.01). Rumination was not investigated because of non-significant associations between PA/NA and sleep quality. The associations were not different for patients and controls.
The analyses were restricted to self-reported sleep quality, and conclusions about causality could not be drawn.
Improvements in sleep quality predicted improvements in affect the following day, partly mediated by fatigue. Treatment of sleep symptoms would benefit affect in clinical care and beyond.
睡眠与情感之间复杂关系的确切性质仍不清楚。本研究调查了有抑郁症和无抑郁症参与者睡眠和情感变化的时间顺序。
27名抑郁症患者和27名配对的健康对照者在自然环境中连续30天每天早上评估他们的睡眠情况,并每天评估3次情感状态。使用每日睡眠质量以及平均积极情感(PA)和消极情感(NA)来检查睡眠质量的变化是先于还是后于PA和NA的变化,以及患者和健康对照者之间是否存在差异。其次,研究了假定的中介因素。我们假设疲劳介导了睡眠质量变化对后续PA/NA的影响,而沉思介导了PA/NA变化对后续睡眠质量的影响。
多层次模型显示,睡眠质量的变化可预测PA(B = 0.08,p < 0.001)和NA(B = -0.06,p < 0.001)的变化,但反之则不然(PA:B = 0.03,p = 0.70,NA:B = -0.05,p = 0.60)。发现疲劳是睡眠质量与PA之间关系的显著中介因素(间接效应 = 0.03,p < 0.001),以及睡眠质量与NA之间关系的显著中介因素(间接效应 = -0.02,p = 0.01)。由于PA/NA与睡眠质量之间的关联不显著,因此未对沉思进行研究。患者和对照者之间的关联没有差异。
分析仅限于自我报告的睡眠质量,无法得出因果关系的结论。
睡眠质量的改善可预测次日情感的改善,部分由疲劳介导。在临床护理及其他方面,治疗睡眠症状将有益于情感状态。