Suppr超能文献

抑郁、压力和疲劳范围内的积极和消极情绪:全球情绪量表(GMS)的双因素困扰模型。

Positive and negative affect within the realm of depression, stress and fatigue: the two-factor distress model of the Global Mood Scale (GMS).

作者信息

Denollet Johan, De Vries Jolanda

机构信息

CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Psychology and Health, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2006 Apr;91(2-3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.044. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Global Mood Scale (GMS; [Denollet, J., 1993a. Emotional distress and fatigue in coronary heart disease: the Global Mood Scale (GMS). Psychol Med 23, 111-121., Denollet, J., 1993b. The sensitivity of outcome assessment in cardiac rehabilitation. J Consult Clin Psychol 61, 686-695.]) was originally developed as a measure of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) in cardiac patients. The purpose of this study was to examine its two-factor affect model in the realm of stress, depression, and fatigue in working adults.

METHODS

Affect, stress, depression, and fatigue were assessed with validated questionnaires in a sample of 228 adults (49.6% male; mean = 41.4 +/- 9 years) from the working population.

RESULTS

The GMS PA and NA scales were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = .94 and alpha = .93, respectively), and correlated in the expected direction with their corresponding mood scales from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Factor analyses of the 40 mood terms comprising the GMS and PANAS yielded one common PA-dimension, but two NA-dimensions reflecting emotional exhaustion (GMS) and anxious apprehension (PANAS) as different components of the stress process. A relatively high mean NA score of the GMS suggested that these working adults perceived terms that refer to malaise/deactivation as being relevant to describe their negative affective status. The GSM-NA scale was related to stress, depression and fatigue while the GMS-PA scale was positively associated with quality of life.

LIMITATIONS

This study is based on a cross-sectional design.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between the PA (negative correlation) and NA (positive correlation) scales of the GMS and perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and fatigue supports the validity of its two-factor model. Assessment of both PA and NA may benefit a better understanding of emotional distress in adults from the working population.

摘要

背景

全球情绪量表(GMS;[德诺莱特,J.,1993年a。冠心病患者的情绪困扰与疲劳:全球情绪量表(GMS)。《心理医学》23卷,第111 - 121页。德诺莱特,J.,1993年b。心脏康复中结局评估的敏感性。《咨询与临床心理学杂志》61卷,第686 - 695页。])最初是作为一种测量心脏病患者积极情绪(PA)和消极情绪(NA)的工具而开发的。本研究的目的是在在职成年人的压力、抑郁和疲劳领域检验其双因素情绪模型。

方法

使用经过验证的问卷对228名在职成年人(男性占49.6%;平均年龄 = 41.4 ± 9岁)样本中的情绪、压力、抑郁和疲劳进行评估。

结果

GMS的PA和NA量表内部一致性良好(克朗巴哈系数分别为α = 0.94和α = 0.93),并与来自积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS)的相应情绪量表在预期方向上相关。对构成GMS和PANAS的40个情绪术语进行因素分析,得出一个共同的PA维度,但有两个NA维度,分别反映情绪耗竭(GMS)和焦虑担忧(PANAS),它们是压力过程的不同组成部分。GMS相对较高的平均NA得分表明,这些在职成年人认为那些指身体不适/活力减退的术语与描述他们的消极情绪状态相关。GSM - NA量表与压力、抑郁和疲劳相关,而GMS - PA量表与生活质量呈正相关。

局限性

本研究基于横断面设计。

结论

GMS的PA(负相关)和NA(正相关)量表与感知到的压力、抑郁症状和疲劳之间的关联支持了其双因素模型的有效性。对PA和NA的评估可能有助于更好地理解在职成年人的情绪困扰。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验