• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Use of the Creighton Tool During a Home Visit Simulation Experience.

作者信息

Livsey Kae Rivers

机构信息

About the Author Kae Rivers Livsey, PhD, RN, MPH, is an associate professor, Western Carolina University School of Nursing, Asheville, North Carolina. The author thanks the J Corbett Charitable Trust, Dr. Soo Kim Godwin, Debra Ezzell, Carol Highsmith, and Heidi Winslow for their support and contributions to this work. Contact Dr. Livesy at

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 Sep/Oct;37(5):283-284. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000041.

DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000041
PMID:27740562
Abstract

This article describes implementation of the Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument to evaluate student performance during a simulated home visit experience. A total of 48 groups of students participating in the simulation were evaluated by peer evaluators and faculty. Interrater reliability was found to be low to fair. Low agreement between raters may be a result of a number of factors, including enhanced faculty familiarity with the instrument and being able to identify evidence of critical thinking being displayed by the students engaged in the simulation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Use of the Creighton Tool During a Home Visit Simulation Experience.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 Sep/Oct;37(5):283-284. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000041.
2
Beyond the Front Door: A Complex Home Visit Simulation.
Nurse Educ. 2018 Mar/Apr;43(2):57-59. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000406.
3
A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student's performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies).获取护理专业学生表现及批判性思维的教育策略比较:基于模拟的培训与综合培训(模拟与批判性思维策略)
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0812-0.
4
Use of Mini-CEX tool to assess clinical competence in family nurse practitioner students using undergraduate students as patients and doctoral students as evaluators.使用Mini-CEX工具,以本科生为患者、博士生为评估者,评估家庭执业护士专业学生的临床能力。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Dec;53(12):719-20. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20141118-11.
5
Use of Student-Created Simulations to Assess Competency.使用学生创建的模拟来评估能力。
Nurse Educ. 2024;49(4):232-233. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001589. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
6
Using QSEN competencies to assess nursing student end-of-life care in simulation.运用QSEN能力标准在模拟情境中评估护理专业学生的临终关怀护理能力。
Nursing. 2018 Apr;48(4):60-65. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000531006.94600.28.
7
Improving the process of community-based student nurse practice through a high-fidelity simulated clinical experience.通过高仿真模拟临床体验提高社区实习护生的实践过程。
Nurse Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):26-30. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000009.
8
Implementation of Deliberate Practice as a Simulation Strategy in Nursing Education.将刻意练习作为模拟策略在护理教育中的实施
Nurse Educ. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):273-274. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000371.
9
Can script concordance testing be used in nursing education to accurately assess clinical reasoning skills?脚本一致性测试能否用于护理教育以准确评估临床推理能力?
J Nurs Educ. 2014 May 1;53(5):281-6. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140321-03. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
10
A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: student and faculty perspectives.一项临床评估工具和流程的描述性研究:学生和教师的观点。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Mar;53(3):S30-3. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140211-02. Epub 2014 Feb 11.